Abstract
This essay analyzes the historical and philosophical context that led to the basic concepts of stereochemistry proposed by Van’t Hoff and Le Bel. Although it is now well established that the key idea of tetrahedral carbon, and in general a geometric view of matter, was pioneered by other chemists, Van’t Hoff and Le Bel used this idea to solve the puzzle of optical activity, thereby establishing a direct linkage between structure and physical properties. It is also interesting to note that their proposals came without experimental verification and they were largely based on experiments conducted by others. Philosophical arguments can, however, be invoked to satisfactorily validate this deductive reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
M.P. Crosland. Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry, Chapter 3. New York: Dover Publications, 1978.
E.L. Eliel and S.H. Wilen. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, pp. 2–6, 15– 20, 58–62. New York: Wiley, 1994.
P.K. Feyerabend. Against Method. London: New Left Books, 1975.
A. Kekulé. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 3: 98–110, 1865.
A. Kekulé. J. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 137: 129–196, 1866.
T.S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
J.A. Le Bel. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 22: 337–347, 1874.
J.R. Partington. A History of Chemistry, Vol. 4, pp. 532–565. New York: Macmillan, 1964.
E. Paternò. Giornale Scienze Nat. Econom. 5: 117–122, 1869.
K.R. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1st edn., pp. 36–37, 53. London: Hutchinson, 1959.
B. Pullman. The Atom in the History of Human Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
P.J. Ramberg. Bull. Hist. Chem. 15/16: 45–53, 1994.
P.J. Ramberg. HYLE – Int. J. Phil. Chem. 6: 35–61, 2000.
O.B. Ramsay (Ed.). Van't Hoff-Le Bel Centennial, ACS Symposium Series 12, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1975.
O.B. Ramsay. Stereochemistry, pp. 56–68. London: Heyden, 1981.
O.B. Ramsay. Stereochemistry, pp. 78–80. London: Heyden, 1981.
O.B. Ramsay. Stereochemistry, pp. 92–97, London: Heyden, 1981.
A.J. Rocke. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Cannizzaro. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1984.
A.M. Rouhi. Chem. Eng. News 77(36): 28–32, 1999.
C.A. Russell. The History of Valency. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1971.
A. Thackray. Atoms and Powers: An Essay on Newtonian Matter – Theory and the Development of Chemistry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.
A. Thackray. John Dalton: Critical Assessments of His Life and Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.
S. Toulmin. Human Understanding, Vol. I. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.
J.H. Van't Hoff. Arch. Neerl. Sci. Exact. Nat. 9: 445–454, 1874.
A. Werner. Z. Anorg. Chem. 3: 267–330, 1893.
J. Wislicenus. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 21: 581–585, 1888.
J. Worrall. In A. O'Hear (Ed.), Philosophy and Problems, pp. 75–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cintas, P. On the Origin of Tetrahedral Carbon: A Case for Philosophy of Chemistry?. Foundations of Chemistry 4, 149–161 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016063004499
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016063004499