Skip to main content
Log in

Mired in Grue

  • Survey Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  1. Douglas Stalker (ed.),GRUE!:The New Riddle of Induction. Chicago: Open Court, 1994. Pp. vii + 466. US$25.95 PB.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Fact, Fiction and Forecast, published by Althone Press, London, 1955, reprinted 1965 (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis). The section dealing with the new riddle was a revision of lectures given in London in 1953.

  2. For example, R. Carnap, “On the Application of Inductive Logic”,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 8, 1947.

  3. In this connection, see R. Schwartz, I. Scheffler and N. Goodman, “An Improvement in the Theory of Projectibility”, J. ofPhilosophy, 67, 1970 and N. Goodman, 94 “On Kahane’s Confusion”J. of Philosophy, 69, 197. Abstracts of these papers are included in the annotated bibliography, pp. 411 and 321.

  4. Mary Hesse, “Ramifications of ‘grue’”,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 20. 1969.

  5. “On Vindicating Induction”,Philosophy of Science, 30, 1963. I have tried to develop his approach in F.J. Clendinnen “Theorising and Empirical Belief” in P.J. Riggs (ed.)Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clenndinen, F.J. Mired in Grue. Metascience 5, 86–94 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988880

Navigation