Skip to main content
Log in

Reference in Conceptual Realism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A conceptual theory of the referential and predicable concepts used in basic speech and mental acts is described in which singular and general, complex and simple, and pronominal and nonpronominal, referential concepts are given a uniform account. The theory includes an intensional realism in which the intensional contents of predicable and referential concepts are represented through nominalized forms of the predicate and quantifier phrases that stand for those concepts. A central part of the theory distinguishes between active and deactivated referential concepts, where the latter are represented by nominalized quantifier phrases that occur as parts of complex predicates. Peter Geach's arguments against theories of general reference in Reference and Generality are used as a foil to test the adequacy of the theory. Geach's arguments are shown to either beg the question of general as opposed to singular reference or to be inapplicable because of the distinction between active and deactivated referential concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Carnap, R.: 1946, ‘Modalities and Quantification’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 11, 33–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N. B.: 1986, Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals, Bibliopolis Press, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N. B.: 1989, ‘Conceptualism, Realism, and Intensional Logic’, Topoi 8, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N. B.: 1996, ‘Conceptual Realism as a Formal Ontology’, in R. Poli and P. Simons (eds.), Formal Ontology, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1980, Reference and Generality, 3rd. edition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1973, ‘Ontological Relativity and Relative Identity’, in M. K. Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology, New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. A.: 1974, in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy, Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1938, Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edition with a new introduction, Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1956, in R. C. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L.: 1972, ‘Relative Identity and Leibniz's Law’, Philosophical Quarterly 22, 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cocchiarella, N.B. Reference in Conceptual Realism. Synthese 114, 169–202 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005005113229

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005005113229

Keywords

Navigation