Abstract
For 78 days in 1999, NATO forces led by theUnited States bombed Yugoslavia, killinghundreds of its civilians and devastating itsinfrastructure. NATO spokesmen justified thebombardment as ``humanitarian intervention''aimed at halting President Slobodan Milosevic's``ethnic cleansing'' of non-Serbs in Yugoslavia. This essay deconstructs NATO's rationalizationsand analyzes other more sinister motives forthe bombing. By containing Yugoslavia, andmaintaining a permanent presence in Kosovo, theUnited States seeks to ensure its access toCaspian Sea oil, and to maintain economichegemony over Europe. U.S. activities inother countries, such as Turkey, corroboratethe non-``humanitarian'' motives for the bombingof Yugoslavia. Finally, the essay analyzes whyNATO's so-called ``humanitarian'' bombardment ofYugoslavia was rather a ``crime againsthumanity'' undertaken in violation ofinternational law.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohn, M. Nato Bombing of Kosovo: Humanitarian Intervention or Crime against Humanity?. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 15, 79–106 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015043810758
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015043810758