Skip to main content
Log in

Android arete: Toward a virtue ethic for computational agents

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional approaches to computer ethics regard computers as tools, andfocus, therefore, on the ethics of their use. Alternatively, computer ethicsmight instead be understood as a study of the ethics of computationalagents, exploring, for example, the different characteristics and behaviorsthat might benefit such an agent in accomplishing its goals. In this paper,I identify a list of characteristics of computational agents that facilitatetheir pursuit of their end, and claim that these characteristics can beunderstood as virtues within a framework of virtue ethics. This frameworkincludes four broad categories – agentive, social, environmental, and moral– each of which can be understood as a spectrum of virtues rangingbetween two extreme subcategories. Although the use of a virtue frameworkis metaphorical rather than literal, I argue that by providing a frameworkfor identifying and critiquing assumptions about what a `good' computer is,a study of android arete provides focus and direction to the developmentof future computational agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Politics. Trans. by Ernest Barker. London: Oxford University Press, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac Asimov. The Perfect Machine. Science Journal, 4(10): 115–118, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac Asimov. I, Robot. NY: Doubleday, 1950; NY: Bantm Books, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Axelrod. The Evolution of Cooperation. Harper Collins-Basic Books, 1984.

  • Fah-Chung, Cheong. Internet Agents: Spiders, Wanderers, Brokers, and Bots. Indianapolis: New Riders, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Danielson. Artificial Morality: Virtuous Robots for Virtual Games. NY: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Eichmann. Ethical Web Agents. Proceedings of the 2nd International World-Wid Web Conference: Mosaic and the Web, pp. 3–13. Chicago, IL, October 18–20, 1994, 1 August 1999 http:// mingo. info-science.uiowa.edu/eichmann/wwwf94/ ethics/ethics.html.

  • Oren Etzioni andDaniel Weld. Softbot-Based Interface to the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 37(7): 72–76, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan Franklin andArt Graesser. Is It an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents. In J. Müller,M. Wooldridge andN. Jennings, editors, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: Proceedings of the ECAI'96 Workshop (ATAL), pp. 20–35. Budapest, Hungary, August 1996. Lecture Notes in AI, subseries of Lecture Notes in Comp. Sci. 1193. NY: Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batya Friedman andHelen Nissenbaum. Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3): 330–347, 1996. Reprinted in B. Friedman, editor, Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, pp. 21–40. CSLI Lecture Notes 72. Stanford: CSLI Publications; NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael R. Genesereth andSteven P. Ketchpel. Software Agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7): 48–53, 147, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Gips. Towards the Ethical Robot. In K. Ford,C. Glymour andP. Hayes, editors, Android Epistemology, pp. 243–252. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162: 1243–1248, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umar Khan. Ethics of Autonomous Learning Systems. In K. Ford,C. Glymour andP. Hayes, editors, Android Epistemology, pp. 253–265. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Kuflik. Computers in Control: Rational Transfer of Authority or Irresponsible Abdication of Autonomy? Computer Ethics: A Philosophical Enquiry (CEPE' 98), London School of Economics and Political Science, 14 & 15 December 1998.

  • George Lakoff andMark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. NY: Basic Books, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • George Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenda Laurel. Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character. In B. Laurel, editor, The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design, pp. 355–365. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990. Reprinted in B. Friedman, editor, Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, pp. 207–219. CSLI Lecture Notes 72. Stanford: CSLI Publications; NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Lenat. Computer Software for Intelligent Systems. Scientific American, 251: 204–213, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alasdair MacIntyre. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Moor. Are There Decisions Computers Should Never Make? Nature and System, 1: 217–229, 1979. Reprinted in D. Johnson and J. Snapper, editors, Ethical Issues in the Use of Computers, pp. 120–130. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Moor. What is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy, (16): 266–275, 1985.

  • Henry Petroski. The Evolution of Useful Things. NY: Borzoi-Knopf, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederik Pohl. Midas World. NY: TOR-Tom Doherty, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Reeves andC.I. Nass. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and NewMedia like Real People and Places. Stanford: CSLI Publications; NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom Regan. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim Smithers. Autonomy in Robots and Other Agents. Brain and Cognition, 34(1): 88–106, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary E. Varner. Biological Functions and Biological Interests. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 28(2): 251–270, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo Versenyi. Can Robots Be Moral? Ethics, 84: 248–259, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • James D. Wallace. Virtues and Vices. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, K.G. Android arete: Toward a virtue ethic for computational agents. Ethics and Information Technology 3, 247–265 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013805017161

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013805017161

Navigation