Critical Notice of Paul Thomson's "The Structure of Biological Theories"

  • Collier J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this critical notice, I argue that the semantic view championed by Thompson no logical advantage over the syntactic view of theories, especially in the area of interpretation. Each weakness of the syntactic view has a corresponding weakness in the semantic view. In principle the two are not different in power, but it is sometimes better to adopt one rather than the other, for practical reasons. I agree with Thompson that many issues in the philosophy of biology can be illuminated by the semantic view, but that other things, especially deriving specific prediction, are best understood with the syntactic view.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Collier, J. D. (1992). Critical Notice of Paul Thomson’s “The Structure of Biological Theories.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free