Abstract
In Book I, Part I, Section VII of the Treatise, Hume sets out to settle, once and for all, the early modern controversy over abstract ideas. In order to do so, he tries to accomplish two tasks: (1) he attempts to defend an exemplar-based theory of general language and thought, and (2) he sets out to refute the rival abstraction-based account. This paper examines the successes and failures of these two projects. I argue that Hume manages to articulate a plausible theory of general ideas; indeed, a version of his account has defenders in contemporary cognitive science. But Hume fails to refute the abstraction-based account, and as a result, the early modern controversy ends in a stalemate, with both sides able to explain how we manage to speak and think in general terms. Although Hume fails to settle the controversy, he nevertheless advances it to a point from which we have yet to progress: the contemporary debate over abstract ideas in cognitive science has stalled on precisely this point.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, R. I. 1941. Hume’s theory of universals. Aristotelian Society Proceedings 42: 117–140.
Barsalou, L. W. 1990. On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In: T. K. Srull and R. S. Wyer (eds), Advances in Social Cognition: Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barsalou, L. W. 1992. Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennett, J. 1971. Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press. %%
%%Berkeley, G. 1982. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of %%Human Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing %%Company.
Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plunkett, K. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garrett, D. 1997. Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hampton, J. 1997. Psychological representation of concepts. In: M. Conway (ed), Cognitive Models of Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hintzman, D. L. 1986. “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory. Psychological Review 93: 411–428.
Hume, D. 1748/1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. 1739/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jolley, N. 1999. Locke: His Philosophical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knapp, A. and Anderson, J. 1984. Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 4: 616–637.
Kruschke, J. 1992. ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review 99: 22–44.
Locke, J. 1690/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Loftus, E. F. 1974. Activation of semantic memory. American Journal of Psychology 86: 331–337.
Medin, D. L. and Schaffer, M. M. 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7: 241–253.
Passmore, J. A. 1952. Hume’s Intentions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, M. I. and Keele, S. 1968. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77: 353–363.
Price, H. H. 1953. Thinking and Experience. London: Hutchinson University Library.
Ratcliff, R. 1978. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85: 59–101.
Ratcliff, R. and McKoon, G. 1981. Does activation really spread? Psychological Review 88: 454–462.
Reed, S. K. 1972. Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology 3: 382–407.
Smith, E. E. and Medin, D. L. 1981. Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tienson, J. 1984. Hume on universals and general terms. Nous 18: 311–330.
Winkler, K. 1989. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zartman, J. 1975. Hume and “the meaning of a word”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36: 255–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collier, M. Hume and cognitive science: The current status of the controversy over abstract ideas. Phenom Cogn Sci 4, 197–207 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-0139-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-0139-5