Skip to main content
Log in

The Galilean turn in population ecology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standard mathematical models in population ecology assume that a population's growth rate is a function of its environment. In this paper we investigate an alternative proposal according to which the rate of change of the growth rate is a function of the environment and of environmental change. We focus on the philosophical issues involved in such a fundamental shift in theoretical assumptions, as well as on the explanations the two theories offer for some of the key data such as cyclic populations. We also discuss the relationship between this move in population ecology and a similar move from first-order to second-order differential equations championed by Galileo and Newton in celestial mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N. and Csaki F. (eds), 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akçakaya H.R., Ginzburg L.R., Slice D. and Slobodkin L.B. 1988. The theory of population dynamics—II: physiological delays. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 50: 503–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce W.E. and DiPrima R.C. 1986. Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems. 4th edn. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G.P. 1971. The second derivative in population modelling. Ecology 52: 606–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyvan M. 2001. The Indispensability of Mathematics. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyvan M. June-2001. The miracle of applied mathematics. Synthese 127: 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster M.R. and Sober E. 1994. How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg L.R. 1972. The analogies of the “free motion” and “force” concepts in population theory, (in Russian). In: Ratner V.A. (ed.), Studies on Theoretical Genetics. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Novosibirsk, pp. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg L.R. 1986. The theory of population dynamics I: back to first principles. Journal of Theoretical Biology 122: 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg L.R. 1998. Inertial growth: population dynamics based on maternal effects. In: Mousseau T.A. and Fox C.W. (eds), Maternal Effects as Adaptions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg L.R. and Colyvan M. 2004. Ecological Orbits: How Planets Move and Populations Grow. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg L.R. and Golenberg E.M. 1985. Lectures in Theoretical Population Biology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg L.R. and Taneyhill D.E. 1994. Population cycles of forest Lepidoptera: a maternal effect hypothesis. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. 1998. A Primer of Ecology. 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland S.E. 1985. Modelling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. 1974. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. and Oster G.T. 1976. Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. American Naturalist 110: 573–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson G.M. 2001. Complexity and Verisimilitude: Realism for Ecology. Biology and Philosophy 16: 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter M.C. 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annual Reviews, Ecological and Systematics 27: 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M. 1998. The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P. 2001. Does population ecology have general laws? Oikos 94: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P. 2003. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical / Empirical Synthesis. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner E.P. 1960. The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards V.C. 1986. Evolution through Group Selection. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee J. 1980. A non-linear second-order population-model. Theoretical Population Biology 18: 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colyvan, M., Ginzburg, L.R. The Galilean turn in population ecology. Biology & Philosophy 18, 401–414 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024121002194

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024121002194

Navigation