Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unilateral jurisdiction: Universal jurisdiction à l’Américaine in the age of post-realist power

Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The United States is using the theme of rights to build its unilateralism. In order to transform this unilateralism into a convincing universalism, it needs to reinforce its “soft power,” appeal to its partners and convince them of the necessity of its initiatives. Aggressive or offensive rights and crude unilateral military interventions are dangerous per se; they might also endanger American power in the long run. Culturally, this challenge is rooted in America’s origins and in its enthusiastic desire to reform the world. In that respect, the shaping of a so-called “world community,” America is challenging continental Europe and its hierarchical universal power rooted in Catholic verticality. On the contrary, the U.S. conception of power is based on a horizontal dynamic, inspired by the structure of the reformation movement. American coercive rights are defying a universal powerless law; Luther is certainly taking its revenge against Rome. Indeed, as for now, America’s universal competence turns out to be more effective than the ICC. However, if the United States does not take into account its own aspirations to define universal norms, it will be more and more difficult for the United States to justify the necessity of its military decisions. any step back to crude realism could be a fatal regression. It will be a mistake for the pursuit of America’s own interests; it would also most probably endanger the stability of the international system, as it would foster rivalries and hostile reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew, Edward. 1988. Shylock’s Rights: A Grammar of Lockian Claims. Toronto University Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, Raymond. 1962. Paix et guerre entre les nations. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baziler, Michael J. 2000. “Nuremberg in America: Litigating the Holocaust in U.S. Courts,” University of Richmond Law Review, 34, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1999. Global Risk Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Coral. 2003. “Normative Shift,” The National Interest (Winter).

  • Bethke Elshtain, Jean. 2003. “Coercive Justice,” Daedalus, 8.

  • Black, Edwin. 2001. IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s Most Powerful Corporation. Crown Publishing Group.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Questions de sociologie, Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilmayer, Lea. 1994. American Hegemony: Political Morality in a One Super Power World, Yale University Press.

  • Chaumont, Jean-Michel. 1997. La concurrence des victimes. La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of State. 1997. U.S. and Allied Efforts to Recover and Restore Gold and Other Assets Stolen or Hidden by Germany during World War II.

  • Drinan, Jon. 1978. Logic and Society—Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, Toni. 2001. “Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States,” Ethics and International Affairs, 15, 2: 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Richard. 2002. “History, Memory, and the Law: The Historian as Expert Witness,” History and Theory, 41, 3: 326–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Brian. 2002. “Unconventional History,” History and Theory, 41, 4: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (January): 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feliciano, Hector. 1997. The Lost Museum: The Nazi Conspiracy to Steal the World’s Greatest Works of Art. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Niall (ed.). 1997. Virtual History-Virtual History. Picador, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, George. 2003. Romantics at War Glory and Guilt in the Age of Terrorism. Princeton University Press.

  • Foucault, Michel. 1994. Dits et Écrits, Paris: Gallimard, vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Richard. 1999. Downfall—The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Peter. 1972. Individual and Collective Responsibility—Massacre at My Lai. Shenkman Publishing, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Peter. 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius, Hugo. 1999. Le droit de la guerre et de la paix. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton University Press.

  • Keck, Margeret and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Cornell University Press.

  • Levy, Richard H. 1996. “The Bombing of Auschwitz Revisited: A Critical Analysis,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies, (Winter): 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, Jay. 2000. “States’ Rights and Foreign Policy, Some Things Should be Left to Washington,” Foreign Affairs, 79, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelman, Ethan. 1990. “Global Prohibition Regimes,” International Organization 44, 4: 479–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, Michael J. and Michael Berenbaum (eds.). 2000. The Bombing of Auschwitz: Should the Allies Have Attempted It? St. Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niall, Ferguson. 1998. The Pity of War. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noiriel, Gérard. 1996. Sur la “crise” de l’histoire, Berlin, Paris.

  • Nye, Joseph. 1992. Bound to Lead. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph. 2002. The Paradox of American Power, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Samantha. 2002. “A Problem from Hell”: America in the Age of Genocide. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Neal and James Olson (eds.). 1995. What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics. Princeton University Press.

  • Rosenfeld, Gavriel. 2002. “Why Do We Ask ‘What If?’ Reflections on the Function of Alternate History,” History and Society, 41, 4: 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousso, Henri. 1988. La hantise du passé: entretien avec Philippe Petit. Textuel, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, William D. 1997. The Myth of Rescue—Why the Democracies Could not Have Saved More Jews from the Nazis. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. “Plaintiff’s Diplomacy,” Foreign Affairs, 79, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1988. States and Markets. Pinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, Cédric. 2003. “La construction et l’expérience des problèmes publics l’exemple de la question des ‘fonds en déshérence’,” in Claudia Barril (dir.). Les formes d’espaces publics. Paris, L’Harmattan, 2003, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, Philip and Aaron Belkin. (eds.). 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics Logical, Methdological and Psychological Perspectives, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Mark. 2001. Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, Peter. 2001. “The Rise of Brand States,” Foreign Affairs, 80, 5: 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1949. “Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Historical Explanation,” in The Methodology of Social Sciences. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, David S. 1978. “Why Auschwitz Was Never Bombed,” Commentary, 16, 5: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, David S. 1984. The Abandonment of the Jews. Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colonomos, A. Unilateral jurisdiction: Universal jurisdiction à l’Américaine in the age of post-realist power. Hum Rights Rev 5, 22–47 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-004-1001-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-004-1001-9

Keywords

Navigation