Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soft architectures for everyday life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technologies not only change “external reality” but also change our internal consciousness, shaping the way we experience the world. As the reality of intelligent environments is upon us—ushered along with the age of ubiquitous computing—we must be careful that the ideology these technologies embody is not blindly incorporated into the environment. As disciplines, engineering and computer science make implicit assumptions about the world that conflict with traditional modes of cultural production. For example, space is commonly understood to be the void left behind when no objects are present. Unfortunately, once we see space in this way, we are unable to understand the role it plays in our everyday experience. In order to make computationally enhanced spaces that are meaningful at the level of the everyday, we must exorcise the notion of intelligence from their design and replace it with life. Henri Lefebvre’s discussions of the space of everyday life provide a framework to help conceive this transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abowd G, Mynatt E (2000) Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(1):29–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P (2001) Where the action is the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H (1992) What computers still can’t do: a critique of artificial reason. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JS (2006) Utility fog: the stuff that dreams are made of. Lecture: Subtle Technologies, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1974) The production of space. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough M (2004) Digital ground: architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny S (1997) The virtualisation of art practice: body knowledge and the engineering world view. CAA Art J 51(3):30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha XW (2005) Ethico-aesthetics in T* performative spaces. In: Kuzmanovic M, Boykett T (eds) On transient realities and their generators. Kibla, Slovenia, pp 22–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons DJ, Chabris CF (1999) Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28:1059–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turing A (1948) Intelligent machinery. National Physical Laboratory report

  • Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Erik Conrad

Authors
  1. Erik Conrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Conrad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conrad, E. Soft architectures for everyday life. AI & Soc 26, 123–128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0291-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0291-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation