Skip to main content
Log in

Faster-than-light particles: A reply to Franklin

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Franklin's underrating the importance of the time-of-flight measurements contradicts Segrè's account of the experiment in two journals and Chamberlain's Nobel Prize acceptance speech. Franklin further fails to understand that Segrè's velocity selector method of determining antiproton and proton mass also depends upon measuring the S1-to-S2 flight distance. Franklin's conclusion that there is no evidence that the Segrè mesons are traveling faster than light is based on a faulty premise about the average antiproton velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nobel Lectures, Physics. 1942–1962 (Elsevier, New York, 1964).

  2. O. Chamberlain, E. C. Segrè, C. E. Wiegand, and T. Ypsilantis,Phys. Rev. 10, 947 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. C. Cooper,Found. Phys. 9, 461 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Franklin,Found. Phys. 12, 1221 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. G. Segrè and C. E. Wiegand,Sci. Am. 194, 37 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Alspector, C. M. Ankenbrandt, J. Cohen, W. C. Harrison, G. R. Kalbfleisch, J. Oostens, and V. VanderBurg,Phys. Rev. D13, 2453 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. M. Gleeson, M. G. Gundzik, A Pagnamenta, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. D6, 807 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Recami,Giornale di Fisica 10, 195 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento 63A, 814 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. D1, 2428 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. van der Spuy,Nuovo Cimento 3A, 882 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. I. Bugrij, L. L. Jenkovsky, and N. A. Kobylinsky,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 5, 389 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. van der Spuy,Phys. Rev. D7, 1106 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Riv. del Nuovo Cimento 4, 209 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. C. Tolman,The Theory of Relativity Motion (Berkeley, Cal., 1917), p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. A. E. Pirani,Phys. Rev. D1, 3224 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. C. Cooper, U. S. Patent Application No. 06/157, 357 (1980), as amended (1982).

  18. O. Costa de Beauregard,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 19, 113 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. P. Stapp,Nuovo Cimento 29B, 270 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. H. Eberhard,Nuovo Cimento 46B, 392 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. D. Driver,Phys. Rev. D19, 1098 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Sharp Cook,Am. Jour. Phys. 48, 175 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Gamow,Thirty Years That Shook Physics (Doubleday, Garden City, N. Y., 1966), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, J.C. Faster-than-light particles: A reply to Franklin. Found Phys 12, 1183–1193 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729624

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729624

Keywords

Navigation