Abstract
It is widely mooted that a plausible computational cognitive model should involve both symbolic and connectionist components. However, sound principles for combining these components within a hybrid system are currently lacking; the design of such systems is oftenad hoc. In an attempt to ameliorate this we provide a framework of types of hybrid systems and constraints therein, within which to explore the issues. In particular, we suggest the use of “system independent” constraints, whose source lies in general considerations about cognitive systems, rather than in particular technological or task-based considerations. We illustrate this through a detailed examination of an interruptibility constraint: handling interruptions is a fundamental facet of cognition in a dynamic world. Aspects of interruptions are delineated, as are their precise expression in symbolic and connectionist systems. We illustrate the interaction of the various constraints from interruptibility in the different types of hybrid systems. The picture that emerges of the relationship between the connectionist and the symbolic within a hybrid system provides for sufficient flexibility and complexity to suggest interesting general implications for cognition, thus vindicating the utility of the framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983),Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (1989).Microcognition, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (1991), ‘In Defense of Explicit Rules’, in W. Ramsey, S.P. Stitch & D.E. Rumelhart, eds.,Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 115–128.
Cooper, R. & Franks, B. (1991), ‘Interruptibility: A New Constraint on Hybrid Systems’,Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour Quarterly 78, pp. 25–30.
Cooper, R. & Franks, B. (1992a), ‘Types of Constraints on Hybrid Models of Cognition’, L.S.E. Research Paper in Psychology, LSE/RPP-92-25. Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics.
Cooper, R. & Franks, B. (1992b), ‘Modularity and Interruptibility: On the Interaction of Constraints on Models of Cognition’, in preparation.
Fodor, J.A. (1983),Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hawthorn, J. (1989), ‘On the Compatibility of Connectionist and Classical Models’,Philosophical Psychology 2(1), pp. 5–15.
Hinton, G.E. & Shallice, T. (1991), ‘Lesioning a Connectionist Network: Investigations of Acquired Dyslexia’,Psychological Review 98(1), pp. 74–95.
Marr, D. (1982),Vision, San Francisco: Freeman.
McClelland, J. & Rumelhart, D. (1986),Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 2, Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
Milner, R. (1989),Communication and Concurrency, London: Prentice Hall.
Mozer, M.C. & Smolensky, P. (1989), ‘Using Relevance to Reduce Network Size Automatically’,Connection Science 1(1), pp. 3–16.
Newell, A. (1990),Unified Theories of Cognition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1986),Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 1, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Sloman, A. (1987). ‘Motives, Mechanisms and Emotions’,Cognition and Emotion 1(3), pp. 217–233.
Smolensky, P. (1986), ‘Neural and Conceptual Interpretation of PDP Models’, in McClelland & Rumelhart (1986), pp. 390–431.
Smolensky, P. (1988). ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’,Behavioural and Brain Sciences 11, pp. 1–74.
Touretzky, D.S. & Hinton, G.E. (1988), ‘A Distributed Connectionist Production System’,Cognitive Science 12, pp. 423–466.
Wermter, S. & Lehnert, W.G. (1989). ‘A Hybrid Symbolic/Connectionist Model for Noun Phrase Understanding’,Connection Science I(3), pp. 225–272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, R., Franks, B. Interruptibility as a constraint on hybrid systems. Mind Mach 3, 73–96 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974306
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974306