Skip to main content
Log in

International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order responsibly to decide whether there ought to be an international legal right of secession, I believe we need an account of the morality of secession. I propose that ’’territorial‘‘ and ’’political‘‘ societies have a moral right to secede, and on that basis I propose a regime designed to give such groups an international legal right to secede. This regime would create a procedure that could be followed by groups desiring to secede or by states desiring to resolve the issue of secession. It would give territorial political societies a legally recognized liberty to conduct a plebiscite on secession, and, assuming such a plebiscite is won by the secessionist side, a qualified right in international law to create a state without interference. Alan Buchanan has argued that proposals of this sort would create “perverse incentives.” I argue that there is no good reason to believe this. The point is to allow the legal regulation of secession in cases where there are active secessionist movements with legitimate moral claims, and to attempt to dampen the desire for secession in cases where secessionist sentiment is not well grounded in social and geographic reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copp, D. International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession. The Journal of Ethics 2, 219–245 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009732228806

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009732228806

Navigation