Abstract
Confronted with problems or situations that do not yield toknown theories and world views, scientists and students are alike. Theyare rarely able to directly build a model or a theory thereof. Rather,they must find ways to make sense of the circumstances using theircurrent knowledge and adjusting what is recognized in the process. Thisway of thinking, using past ways of perceiving the physical world tobuild new ones does not follow a logical path and cannot be described astheory revision. Likewise, in many situations it is awkward, indeedoften impossible, to resort to analogical reasoning to account for it.This paper presents a new mechanism, called `tunnel effect', that mayexplain, in part, how scientists and students reason while constructinga new conceptual domain. `Tunnel effect' is also contrasted withanalogical reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cauzinille-Marmèche, E., G. Collet, A. Cornuéjols and A. Tiberghien: 1997, Co-adaptation of students' knowledge domains when interpreting a physical situation in terms of a new theory. In Proc. of the 2nd European Conf. on Cognitive Sciences (ECCS'97). Manchester, April 1997, 107–112.
Falkenhainer, B., K.D. Forbus and D. Gentner: 1989, Structure-mapping engine. Artificial Intelligence 41: 1–63.
Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner: 1998, Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133–187.
Greiner, R.: 1988, Learning by understanding analogies. Artificial Intelligence 35: 81–125.
Hofstadter, D.: 1995, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, Basic Books.
Holton, G.: 1973, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Kepler to Einstein: Harvard University Press.
Longair, M.S.: 1984, Theoretical Concepts in Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Megalakaki, O. and A. Tiberghien: 1995, Corpus de dialogues de trois groupe d'élèves résolvant trois problèmes mettant en jeu une activité de modélisation, CNRS-COAST Research Report, no. CR-10/95.
Megalakaki, O.: 1995, Expérience MARIANNE: corpus de dialogues de trois gourpes d'élèves résolvant une séquence de problèmes mettant en jeu une activité de modélisation, CNRS-COAST Research Report, no. CR-11/95.
Mitchell, M.: 1993, Analogy-Making as Perception. MIT Press.
Nersessian, N.: 1992, How Do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Changes in Science. In R. Giere (ed.), The Minesota Studies in the Philosophy of science XV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–44.
Ohlsson, S.: 1996, Learning to Do and Learning to Understand. A Lesson and a Challenge for Cognitive Modeling. In P. Reiman and H. Spada (eds.), Learning in Humans and Machines. Oxford: Pergamon, 37–62.
Planck, M.: 1931, Letter from M. Planck to R.W. Wood. (See Hermann, A., 1971, The Genesis of Quantum Theory (1899-1913), Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 23–24).
Schrödinger, E.: 1982, Ma Conception du Monde. (My vision of the world). Mercure de France, p. 30.
Science & Vie: 1994, Special issue on Carnot and the discovery of thermodynamics (in French).
Tiberghien, A.: 1994, Modelling as a Basis for Analysing Teaching-Learning Situations. Learning and Instruction 4(1): 71–87.
Tiberghien, A.: 1996, Construction of Prototypical Situations in Teaching the Concept of Energy. In G. Welford, J. Osborne and P. Scott (eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe. London: Falmer Press. 100–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cornuéjols, A., Tiberghien, A. & Collet, G. A New Mechanism for Transfer Between Conceptual Domains in Scientific Discovery and Education. Foundations of Science 5, 129–155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011398802965
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011398802965