How not to argue about immigration

  • Corlett A
  • Unger K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes and assesses the arguments offered both against closed borders and in favor of a more open borders approach to U.S. immigration reform as those arguments are set forth in R. Pevnick?s book, Immigration and the Constraints of Justice. We find numerous problems with Pevnick?s reasoning on both counts.U radu ce biti predstavljeni i razmotreni argumenti koje R.Pevnik, u svojoj novoj knjizi Imigracija i ogranicenja pravde, nudi protiv pristupa koji podrazumeva zatvorene granice, a u prilog pristupu otvorenijih granica u reformi imigracione politike SAD-a. Ukazacemo na brojne probleme u Pevnikovoj argumentaciji povodom obe tvrdnje.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corlett, A., & Unger, K. (2013). How not to argue about immigration. Filozofija i Drustvo, 24(2), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.2298/fid1302277c

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free