This paper describes and assesses the arguments offered both against closed borders and in favor of a more open borders approach to U.S. immigration reform as those arguments are set forth in R. Pevnick?s book, Immigration and the Constraints of Justice. We find numerous problems with Pevnick?s reasoning on both counts.U radu ce biti predstavljeni i razmotreni argumenti koje R.Pevnik, u svojoj novoj knjizi Imigracija i ogranicenja pravde, nudi protiv pristupa koji podrazumeva zatvorene granice, a u prilog pristupu otvorenijih granica u reformi imigracione politike SAD-a. Ukazacemo na brojne probleme u Pevnikovoj argumentaciji povodom obe tvrdnje.
CITATION STYLE
Corlett, A., & Unger, K. (2013). How not to argue about immigration. Filozofija i Drustvo, 24(2), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.2298/fid1302277c
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.