P.M.S. Hacker has argued that there are numerous misconceptions in James Conant's account of Wittgenstein's views and of those of Carnap. I discuss only Hacker's treatment of Conant on logical syntax in the 'Tractatus'. I try to show that passages in the 'Tractatus' which Hacker takes to count strongly against Conant's view do no such thing, and that he himself has not explained how he can account for a significant passage which certainty appears to support Conant's reading. © The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly, 2005.
CITATION STYLE
Diamond, C. (2005). Logical syntax in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Philosophical Quarterly. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00386.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.