Skip to main content
Log in

Situated minimalism versus free enrichment

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we put forward a position we call “situationalism” (or “situated minimalism”), which is a middle-ground view between minimalism and contextualism in recent philosophy of language. We focus on the notion of free enrichment, which first arose within contextualism as underlying the claim that what is said is typically enriched relative to the logical form of the uttered sentence. However, minimalism also acknowledges some process of pragmatic intrusion in its claim that what is thought and communicated is typically enriched relative to what is said. We show that situationalism dispenses with free enrichment both at the level of what is said (proposition expressed) and of what is thought (mental level). According to situationalism, an alleged underdetermined utterance can, pace minimalism, be true in one situation while false in another, and two people using the same alleged underdetermined sentence can be characterized, pace contextualism, as having said the same thing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach K. (1994) Conversational implicitures. Mind and Language 9: 124–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach K. (1999) The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(4): 327–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach K. (2001) You don’t say?. Synthese 128(1–2): 15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Perry J. (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezuidenhout A. (2002) Truth-conditional pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg E. (2004) Minimal semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen H., Lepore E. (2005) Insensitive semantics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers P. (2006) The architecture of mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carston R. (2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza E. (2004) Reflecting the mind: Indexicality and quasi-indexicality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza E. (2007) Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism. Pragmatics and Cognition 15(1): 115–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza E., Dokic J. (2007) Sense and insensitivity: Or where minimalism meets contextualism. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays in semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 169–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokic J. (2006) From linguistic contextualism to situated cognition: The case of ad hoc concepts. Philosophical Psychology 19: 309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. (2001) Language, thought and compositionality. Mind and Language 16(1): 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S. (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Korta K., Perry J. (2007) Radical minimalism, moderate contextualism. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays in semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 94–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson R., Segal G. (1995) Knowledge of meaning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie S.-J. (2007) Moderate sensitive semantics. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays in semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 133–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Manrique F., Vicente A. (2009) On the psychological reality of minimal propositions. In: De Brabanter P., Kissine M. (eds) Utterance interpretation and cognitive models. Emerald, London, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1986). Thoughts without representation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60, 137–152. Reprinted in Perry, J. (2000). The problem of the essential indexical and other essays (pp. 171–188). Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Perry J. (2001) Reference and reflexivity. CSLI Publications, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry J. (2007) Situating semantics: A response. In: O’Rourke M., Washington C. (eds) Situating semantics: Essays on the philosophy of John Perry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 507–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Predelli S. (2005) Contexts. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F. (1993) Direct reference. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F. (2002) Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F. (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F. (2007) Perspectival thoughts. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle J. (1978) Literal meaning. Erkenntnis 13: 207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soames S. (2005) Naming and asserting. In: Gendler Szabo Z. (eds) Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 356–382

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D., Wilson D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D., Wilson D. (1998) The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In: Carruthers P., Boucher J. (eds) Language and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D., Wilson D. (2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17(1–2): 3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor K. (2007) A little sensitivity goes a long way. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays in semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 63–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis C. (1985) On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187–229

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eros Corazza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corazza, E., Dokic, J. Situated minimalism versus free enrichment. Synthese 184, 179–198 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9731-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9731-5

Keywords

Navigation