Abstract
This paper rejects dualism between mind and body toview the self as an embodied biological entity. Rather thanseeing the body operating by passive mechanisms as Descartesargues, it holds it actively moves in and even defines its world. Carrying this perspective to medicine presents an attempt toincorporate or work with internal processes of the body; it issensitive to how patients identify with their bodies. Thecurrent discussion over the extent to which women should try tohave natural childbirths provides a concrete example of thedifferences between mechanistic and embodied approaches tomedicine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
NOTES AND REFERENCES
Descartes R, translated by D. Cress. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993.
Descartes R, translated and edited by S. Gaukroge. Treatise on Man in The World and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Husserl E, translated by D. Carr. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Straus E, translated by E. Eng. Phenomenological Psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
Straus, p. 139.
Jonas H. The Imperative of Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Ibid., p. 74.
Davis-Floyd R. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
Ibid., pp. 211–212.
Ibid., pp. 130–131.
O'Driscoll K, Foley M. Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983; 61, pp. 1–5. Pearson J. Cesarean section and perinatal mortality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984; 148, pp. 155-159.
Adams A. Reproducing the Womb. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.
See Davis-Floyd, pp. 129–130.
Klein M, Gauthier R, Robbins J, Kaczorowski J, Jorgensen S, Franco E, Johnson B, Waghorn K, Gelfand M, Guralnick M, Luskey G, Joshi A. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 171, pp. 591–598.
Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. A significant limitation of Kuhn's model of science stems from the fact that aside from physics and perhaps chemistry, many of the sciences such as biology require students to learn to read research papers with an open mind early in the educational process. Ironically, Kuhn considers these sciences less ‘mature’ (Kuhn: 5). Nonetheless, medical education would seem to conform to Kuhn's model of indoctrinating the students into viewing the world through one inflexible paradigm by means of textbooks.
Davis-Floyd, pp. 257–264.
Cassell E. The sorcerer's broom: medicine's rampant technology. The Hastings Center Report 1993; 23(6): 32–39.
Pellegrino E, Thomasma D. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Quine W. Two Dogmas of Empiricism in From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper & Row, 1963. Hanson N. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Putnam H. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. Longino H. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990. Cosans C. Anatomy, metaphysics, and values: the ape brain debate reconsidered. Biology and Philosophy 1994; 9, pp. 129-165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cosans, C. The Embodiment of Birth. Theor Med Bioeth 22, 47–55 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995420899
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995420899