Abstract
How are general relations of law and morality typically conceived in an environment of Anglo-saxon common law? This paper considers some classical common law methods and traditions as these have confronted and been overlaid with modern ideas of legal positivism. While classical common law treated a community and its morality as the cultural foundation of law, legal positivism's analytical separation of law and morals, allied with liberal approaches to legal regulation, have made the relationship of legal and moral principles more complex and contested. Using ideas from Durkheim's and Weber's sociology, I argue that the traditional common law emphasis on an inductive, empirical treatment of moral practices has continuing merit, but in contemporary conditions the vague idea of community embedded in classical common law thought must be replaced with a much more precise conceptualisation of coexisting communities, whose moral bonds are diverse and require a corresponding diversity of forms of legal recognition or protection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Atiyah, P.S., Promises, Morals, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Austin, L., Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law, 5th edn. London: John Murray, 1885.
Bobbio, N., The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game, transl. by R. Griffin. Cambridge: Polity, 1987.
Collins, H., Democracy and Adjudication, in N. MacCormick and P. Birks (eds.), The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 67–82.
Cotterrell, R., The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Butterworths, 1989.
Cotterrell, R., Law's Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Cotterrell, R., A Legal Concept of Community, Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 12 (1997), pp 75–91.
Cotterrell, R., Émile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press/ Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
DevIin, P., The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.
Durkheim, É., L'individualisme et les intellectuels, in Durkheim, La science sociale et l'action, ed. by L-C. Filloux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1970, pp. 261–78.
Durkheim, É., Moral Education, transl. by E. K. Wilson and H. Schnurer. New York: Free Press, 1973.
Durkheim, É., Textes 2. Religion, morale, anomie, ed. by V. Karady. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1975.
Dworkin, R.M., Taking Rights Seriously, revised edn. London: Duckworth, 1978.
Dworkin, R.M., Law's Empire. London: Fontana, 1986.
Finnis, L., Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
Fried, C., Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
Fuller, L.L., The Morality of Law, revised edn. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.
Fuller, L.L., The Principles of Social Order, ed. by K. I. Winston. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1981.
Garapon, A., French Legal Culture and the Shock of 'Globalization', Social and Legal Studies, 4 (1995), pp. 493–506.
Green, T.A., Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury, 1200–1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Hart, H.L.A., Law, Liberty and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Herman, S., Quot judices tot sententiae: A Study of the English Reaction to Continental Interpretive Techniques, Legal Studies, 1 (1981), pp. 165–89.
Kennedy, H., Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice. London: Vintage, 1992.
Levitsky, L, The Europeanisation of the British Legal Style, American Journal of Comparative Law, 42 (1994), pp. 368–78.
Mill, J.S., Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, ed. by G. G. Williams. London: J.M. Dent, 1993.
Northrop, F.S.C., The Complexity of Legal and Ethical Experience. Boston: Little, Brown, 1959.
Postema, G.L, Bentham and the Common Law Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
Simpson, A.W.B., The Common Law and Legal Theory, in W. Twining (ed.), Legal Theory and Common Law. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, pp. 8–25.
Stephen, J.F., Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. London: Smith, Elgard, 1873.
Teubner, G., Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences, Modern Law Review, 61 (1998), pp. 11–32.
Watson, A., Sources of Law, Legal Change and Ambiguity. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1985.
Weber, M., Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions, in H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (eds.and transl.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948, pp. 323–59.
Weber, M., Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, transl. by E. Fischoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H., Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn., transl. by T. Weir. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cotterrell, R. Common Law Approaches to the Relationship Between Law and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3, 9–26 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009935831906
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009935831906