This article was written jointly by a philosopher and a mathematician. It has two aims: to acquaint mathematicians with some of the philosophical questions at the foundations of their subject and to familiarize philosophers with some of the answers to these questions which have recently been obtained by mathematicians. In particular, we argue that, if these recent findings are borne in mind, four different basic philosophical positions, logicism, formalism, platonism and intuitionism, if stated with some moderation, are in fact reconcilable, although with some reservations in the case of logicism, provided one adopts a nominalistic interpretation of Plato's ideal objects. This eclectic view has been asserted by Lambek and Scott (LS 1986) on fairly technical grounds, but the present argument is meant to be accessible to a wider audience and to provide some new insights. © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
CITATION STYLE
Couture, J., & Lambek, J. (1991). Philosophical reflections on the foundations of mathematics. Erkenntnis, 34(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385720
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.