Skip to main content
Log in

A ‘Parallel process’? beginning a constructive conversation about a Mäori methodology

  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper documents the beginning of a conversation about what it means to be Mäori within a larger, mainstream research project. This larger project was conceived by a team of researchers that included a Mäori principal investigator, and funding was gained from a funding agency that has established criteria for Mäori responsiveness. The Mäori component of the project was, however, not initially conceived of as separate from the non-Mäori component. Discussions about this were initiated approximately one year into the project in response to Mäori team members' desires to undertake Kaupapa Mäori research. This effectively means that the Mäori team colects and analyses the Mäori research data prior to re-engaging with the full research team. While there is a level of uncertainty about how this process will play itself out, there is a commitment to continue a constructive conversation within the team and to journey together in good faith and trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cram F, Pihama L, Philip-Barbara G. Mäori and genetic engineering. Tamaki Makaurau: IRI Publications; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greensill A. Genetic engineering — Mäori views and values. Pacific World 1999 Oct:25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cram F. Gackground Mäori views on genetic engineering. In: Barker J, editor, Sovereignty: Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska Press, in press 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mead ATeP. Misappropriation of indigenous knowledge: The next wave of colonisation. In: Nga tikanga, nga taonga. Cultural and intellectual property — The rights of indigenous peoples. University of Auckland: RUME; 1996.

  5. Smith I. Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books et Dunedin: Otago University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cram F. in collaboration with Henare M, Hunt T, Mauger J, Pahiri D, Pitama S, Tuuta C Mäori and science — Three case studies. A report prepared for the Royal Society of New Zealand. Tamaki Makaurau: IRI Publications; 2002. [cited 2004 Oct 12]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirby M. [homepage on the Internet]. Global approach to genetic enquiry is essential. Canberra: High Court of Australia; no date. [cited 2004 26 June]. Available from: http://www.hcourt.gov.au/speeches/kirbyj/kirbyj-genetics.htm.

  8. Netlink. Panama: Indigenous people raise alarms about… [press release on the Internet]. Netlink; 1997 Oct 12. [cited 2004 26 Jun]. Available from: http://www.netlink.de/gen/Zeitung/971219b.htm.

  9. Greensill A. Statement of Evidence of Angeline Greensill in the matter of Application for Approval to Field Test in Containment any Genetically Modified Organism, by AgResearch.

  10. Harry D. Biopiracy and globalization: Indigeneous peoples face a new wave of colonialism. Splice 2001. Jan/April 7 2et3. [cited 2004 June 10]. Available from: http://www.ipcb.org/publications/other_art/index.html.url

  11. Shelton BL. Consent and consultation in genetic research on American Indians and Alaska Natives. [briefing paper on the Internet]. Nixon (NV): Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism; no date. [cited 2004 Apr 15]. Available at. http://www.ipcb.org/publications/briefing_papers/files/consent.html.

  12. Graham A, McDonald J. Ethical principles for the conduct of research in the North. [monograph on the Internet]. Yukon College: Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies; 1997 [cited 2002 16 Sept] Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  13. Health Research Council. Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Mäori. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Humphery K. Setting the rules: The development of the NHmrc guidelines on ethical matters in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. N Z Bioethics J. 2003 Feb;4(1):14–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Te Awekotuku N. He tikanga whakaaro: Research ethics in the Mäori community. Wellington: Manatu Mäori; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cram F. Developing partnerships in research: Mäori research and Pakeha researchers. SITES 1997;35:44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dewes K. Mäori education. In: Report of the Young Mäori Leaders Conference. Department of University Extension, The University of Auckland; 1968.

  18. Cram F. Rangahau Mäori: Tona tika, tona pono. In: Tolich M, editor. Research ethics in Aotearoa. Auckland: Longman; 2001. p. 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bishop R. Addressing issues in self-determination and legitimation in Kaupapa Mäori research. In: Webber B, compiler. He paipai körero. Wellington. New Zealand Council for Educational Research; 1996. p. 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pihama L, Cram F, Walker S. Creating methodological space: A literature review of Kaupapa Mäori research. Can J Native Educ. 2002;26:30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson M. Mäori health research and Te Tiriti o Waitangi. In: Hui Whakapiripiri: A hui to discuss strategic directions for Mäori health research. Wellington School of Medicine: Te Röpü Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pömare; 1996.

  22. World Health Organization. Toward a comprehensive approach to health guidelines for research with Indigenous Peoples. Report of the Working Group on Research, November 29–December 1, 1995. Washington, DC: Division of Health Systems and Services Development World Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lather P. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. hooks b. Ain't I a woman: Black women and feminism. Cambridge (MA): South End Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cajete G. Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Sante Fe: Clear Light; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pihama LE. Tungia te ururua, kia tupu whakaritorito te tepu o te harakeke. MA thesis, The University of Auckland; 1993.

  27. Smith GH. The development of Kaupapa Mäori theory and praxis. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Auckland; 1997.

  28. Simon J, Smith LT with Cram F, Höhepa M, McNaughton S, Stephenson M. A civilising mission? Perceptions and representations of the Native Schools system. Auckland: Auckland University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cram F, Smith L, Johnstone W. Mapping the themes of Mäori talk about health. N Z Med J. 2003 Mar 14;116(1170).

  30. McCreanor T, Nairn R. (2002). Tauiwi general practitioners'talk about Mäori health: interpretative repertoires. N Z Medical J. 2002 Dec 13;115(1167).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cram, F., Phillips, H., Tipene-Matua, B. et al. A ‘Parallel process’? beginning a constructive conversation about a Mäori methodology. J. Bioethical Inquiry 1, 14–19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02448902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02448902

Key Words

Navigation