Skip to main content
Log in

Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Newcomb's Paradox thus serves as an illustrative vindication of the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. A proper understanding of the counterfactual conditionals involved enables us to see that the pastness of God's knowledge serves neither to make God's beliefs counterfactually closed nor to rob us of genuine freedom. It is evident that our decisions determine God's past beliefs about those decisions and do so without invoking an objectionable backward causation. It is also clear that in the context of foreknowledge, backtracking counterfactuals are entirely appropriate and that no alteration of the past occurs. With the justification of the one box strategy, the death of theological fatalism seems ensured. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A0985044 00003

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craig, W.L. Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox. Philosophia 17, 331–350 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02455055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02455055

Keywords

Navigation