Skip to main content
Log in

Relational properties, causal powers and psychological laws

Acta Analytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that Twin Earth twins belong to the same psychological natural kind, but that the reason for this is not that the causal powers of mental states supervene on local neural structure. Fodor’s argument for this latter thesis is criticized and found to rest on a confusion between it and the claim that Putnamian and Burgean type relational psychological properties do not affect the causal powers of the mental states that have them. While it is true that Putnamian and Burgean type relational psychological properties do not affect causal powers, it is false that no relational psychological properties do. Examples of relational psychological properties that do affect causal powers are given and psychological laws are sketched that subsume twins in virtue of them instantiating these relational properties rather than them sharing the narrow contents of their thoughts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Lynn Rudder. 1995. Explaining Attitudes. A Practical Approach to the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler. 1982. Other Bodies. In Woodfield.

  • -- 1986. Individualism and Psychology. Philosophical Review 95.

  • -- 1989. Individuation and Causation in Psychology. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70.

  • -- 1995. Intentional Properties and Causation. In Macdonald and Macdonald.

  • Crane, Tim. 1991. All the Difference in the World. Philosophical Quarterly 41.

  • Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1987. Problems in the Explanation of Action. In P. Pettit, R. Sylvan, and J. Norman, eds., Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J.J.C. Smart. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1993. Thinking Causes. In John Heil and Alfred Mele, eds. Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Marin. 1986. Externality, Psychological Explanation, and Narrow Content. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 60.

  • -- 1991. Individualism and Perceptual Content. Mind 100.

  • -- 1992. Perceptual Content and Local Supervenience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92.

  • —— 1998. Externalism, Architecuralism, and Epistemic Warrant. In Crispin Wright, Barry C. Smith, and Cynthia Macdonald, eds., Knowing Our Own Minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 1982. Beyond Belief. In Woodfield.

  • Earman, John and John Roberts. 1999. Ceteris Paribus, There is not Problem of Provisos. Synthese 118.

  • Evans, Gareth. 1980. Commentary on Fodor (1980). The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3.

  • Fodor, Jerry. 1974. Special Sciences. Synthese 28.

  • -- 1980. Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3.

  • —— 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1989. Making Mind Matter More. Philosophical Topics 17. Reprinted in Fodor (1990).

  • —— 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1991. A Modal Argument for Narrow Content. Journal of Philosophy 88. Reprinted in Macdonald and Macdonald.

  • —— 1994 The Elm and the Expert. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. 1988. Provisoes: A Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Theories. Erkenntnis 28.

  • Kaplan, David. 1989. ‘Demonstratives’. In Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein, eds. Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1981. What Puzzling Pierre does not Believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59.

  • Loar, Brian. 1988. Social Content and Psychological Content. In R. Grimm and D. Merrill, eds., Contents of Thought. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Reprinted in Rosenthal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Cynthia and Graham Macdonald, eds. 1995. Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Adam. 1975. Because He Thought He Had Insulted Him. Journal of Philosophy 62.

  • Peacocke, Christopher. 1981. Demonstrative Thought and Psychological Explanation. Synthese 49.

  • -- 1993. Externalist Explanation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93.

  • Pietrosky, Paul and Georges Rey. 1995. When Other Things Aren’t Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46.

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The Meaning of ‘Meaning’. In K. Gunderson, ed., Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Reprinted in Hilary Putnam, Mind, Language, and Reality. Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François. 1993. Direct Reference. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert. 1989. On What’s in the Head. In James E. Tomberlin, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 3: Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1990. Narrow Content. In Anderson, C. Anthony and Joseph Owens, eds. 1990. Propositional Attitudes. The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen. 1978. Autonomous Psychology and the Belief-Desire Thesis. The Monist 61.

  • Tomkow, Terrance. 1992. Against Representation. Unpublished ms. Dalhousie University.

  • Woodfield, Andrew, ed. 1982. Thought and Object. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford, S. Relational properties, causal powers and psychological laws. Acta Anal 18, 193–216 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-003-1021-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-003-1021-0

Keywords

Navigation