Skip to main content
Log in

Thing Talk Moonlighting

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is controversial whether the truth conditions of attitude sentences are opaque. It is not, or shouldn't be controversial, however, that conditions of apt or unexceptionable usage are opaque. A framework for expressing such uncontroversial claims of opacity is developed, and within this framework it is argued that opacity resides at a “locutionary” level — that it is a matter of expressed content (which might not be truth-conditional). The same claim is made for a related pattern in attitude talk which is labeled the “moonlighting” use of thing-talk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crimmins, M. Thing Talk Moonlighting. Philosophical Studies 108, 83–98 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015712231136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015712231136

Keywords

Navigation