Abstract
The first part of this paper consists of an exposition of the views expressed by Pierre Duhem in his Aim and Structure of Physical Theory concerning the philosophy and historiography of mathematics. The second part provides a critique of these views, pointing to the conclusion that they are in need of reformulation. In the concluding third part, it is suggested that a number of the most important claims made by Duhem concerning physical theory, e.g., those relating to the ‘Newtonian method’, the limited falsifiability of theories, and the restricted role of logic, can be meaningfully applied to mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariew, R.: 1984, ‘The Duhem Thesis’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35, 313–25.
Bonola, R.: 1955, Non-Euclidean Geometry: A Critical and Historical Study of Its Development, trans. by H. S. Carslaw, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Boutroux, P.: 1907, ‘La Théorie physique de M. Duhem et les mathématiques’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 15, 363–76.
Boutroux, P.: 1920, L'Idéal scientifique des mathématiens: dans l'antiquité et dans les temps modernes, Paris, pp. 230–48.
Boyer, C. B.: 1968: A History of Mathematics. Wiley, New York.
Crowe, M. J.: 1985. A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System, Dover Publications. Inc., New York.
Crowe, M. J.: 1988, ‘Ten Misconceptions about Mathematics and Its History’, in William Aspray and Philip Kitcher (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 260–77.
Duhem, P.: 1912, ‘La Nature du raisonnement mathématique’, Revue de philosophie 21, 531–43.
Duhem, P.: 1915, La Science allemande. A. Hermann & Fils, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. by Philip P. Wiener from the 1914. 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Gray, J.: 1979, Ideas of Space: Euclidean, Non-Euclidean, and Relativistic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Hahn, H.: 1956, ‘The Crisis in Intuition’, in James Newman (ed.), The World of Mathematics, vol.3, Simon and Schuster, New York, pp. 1956–76.
Jaki, S. L.: 1984, Uneasy Genius: The Life and Work of Pierre Duhem, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
Kline, M.: 1980, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford University Press, New York.
Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, J. Worrall and E. Zahar (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lasserre, F.: 1964, The Birth of Mathematics in the Age of Plato, Hutchinson, London.
Martin, N.: 1981, The Philosophy of Physics According to Pierre Duhem: An Historical and Critical Essay on the Philosophy and Historiography of a Catholic Physicist, a London School of Economics doctoral dissertation.
Pierce, C. S.: 1892, ‘The Non-Euclidean Geometry’, in Charles S. Peirce: Contributions to The Nation. Part One: 1869–1893, compiled and annotated by K. L. Ketner and J. E. Cook, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 1975, pp. 135–8.
Poincaré, H.: 1952, Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Richards, J.: 1988, Mathematical Visions: The Pursuit of Geometry in Victorian England, Academic Press, Inc., Boston.
Trudeau, R.J.: 1987, The Non-Euclidean Revolution, Birkhäuser, Boston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am indebted to Professors Douglas Jesseph and Philip Quinn for helpful comments on this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crowe, M.J. Duhem and history and philosophy of mathematics. Synthese 83, 431–447 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413427
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413427