Skip to main content
Log in

Paternalism and Corporate Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some writers suggest that corporations should act in ways which reflect a broad concern for the well-being of others, as opposed to a more narrow (Libertarian) conception of responsibility. But this Broad View of moral responsibility puts us on a collision course with our considered intuitions about paternalistic acts. This paper discusses several aspects of this issue: the neutrality of the Standard View of Paternalism, the nature of the defenses of paternalistic interventions allowed by the Standard View of Paternalism and their reliance on consent; and the sort of position on paternalism the Board View would have to endorse in order to justify the benevolence-motivated orientation required by its conception of moral responsibility.

The conclusion is that unless we are prepared to take a different, non-standard view of paternalism the Board View of corporate moral responsibility will be untenable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dworkin, G.: 1971, 'Paternalism', in R. Wasserstrom (ed.), Morality and the Law (Wadsworth, Belmont).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G.: 1988, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J.: 1983, 'Legal Paternalism', in R. Sartorius (ed.), Paternalism (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J.: 1986: Harm to Self (Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry G.: 1971, 'Freedom to the Will and the Concept of a Person', Journal of Philosophy LXVIII.

  • Friedman, M: 1970, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', The New York Times Magazine.

  • Green, T. H.: 1983, 'Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract', in R. L. Nettleship (ed.), The Works of T. H. Green, Vol. III (Longmans, Green, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Ian, 1992: 'When Human Rights Become Wrongs', in Cragg, W., Contemporary Moral Issues, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. M., 1991: The Philosophic Dictionary (Broadview Press, Peterborough).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, Alex C., 1991: 'Moral Responsibility in Business or Fourteen Unsuccessful Ways to Pass the Buck', in D. C. Poff and W. J. Waluhcow (eds.), Business Ethics in Canada, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Scarborough).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savan, Beth: 1989, 'Beyond Professional Ethics: Issues and Agendas', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, Henry: 1981, The Methods of Ethics, 7th edition (Hackett Publishing Company. Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1991, 'Distributive Justice and Utilitarianism', in John Arthur and William Shaw, Justice and Economic Distribution, 2nd edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDeVeer, Donald: 1986, Paternalistic Intervention: the Moral Bounds of Benevolence (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crossley, D. Paternalism and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 21, 291–302 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005937807850

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005937807850

Keywords

Navigation