Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of human reasoning

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research from ethology and evolutionary biology indicates the following about the evolution of reasoning capacity. First, solving problems of social competition and cooperation have direct impact on survival rates and reproductive success. Second, the social structure that evolved from this pressure is the dominance hierarchy. Third, primates that live in large groups with complex dominance hierarchies also show greater neocortical development, and concomitantly greater cognitive capacity. These facts suggest that the necessity of reasoning effectively about dominance hierarchies left an indelible mark on primate reasoning architectures, including that of humans. In order to survive in a dominance hierarchy, an individual must be capable of (a) making rank discriminations, (b) recognizing what is forbidden and what is permitted based one's rank, and (c) deciding whether to engage in or refriin from activities that will allow one to move up in rank. The first problem is closely tied to the capacity for transitive reasoning, while the second and third are intimately related to the capacity for deontic reasoning. I argue that the human capacity for these types of reasoning have evolutionary roots that reach deeper into our ancestral past than the emergence of the hominid line, and the operation of these evolutionarily primitive reasoning systems can be seen in the development of human reasoning and domain-specific effects in adult reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AlcockJ. (1984),Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, Sunderland, Ma: Sinauer Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ArugueteM. (1994), ‘Cognition, Tradition, and the Explanation of Social Behavior in Non-Human Primates’, [Review ofSocial Processes and Mental Abilities in Non-Human Primates].American Journal of Primatology, 33, 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • AxelrodR. (1984),The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • AxelrodR., & HamiltonW.D. (1981), ‘The Evolution of Cooperation’,Science, 211, 1390–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaillargeonR. (1987), ‘Object Permanence in 3 1/2-and 4 1/2-Month-Old Infants’,Developmental Psychology, 23, 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaillargeonR. (1994), ‘How Do Infants Learn about the Physical World?’,Current Directions inPsychological Science, 3, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • BertramB.C.R. (1976), ‘Kin Selection in Lions and Evolution’, in P.P.G.Bateson and R.A.Hinde, eds.,Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • BraineM.D.S. (1978), ‘On the Relation between the Natural Logic of Reasoning and Standard Logic’,Psychological Review, 85, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • BraineM.D.S., & O'BrienD.P. (1991), ‘A Theory of If: a Lexical Entry, Reasoning Program, and Pragmatic Principles’,Psychological Review, 98, 182–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • BryantP.E., & TrabassoT. (1971), ‘Transitive Inference and Memory in Young Children’,Nature, 240, 456–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • BygottJ.D., BertramB.C.R., & HanbyJ.P. (1979), ‘Males Lions in Large Coalitions Gain Reproductive Advantage’,Nature, 282, 839–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • CamposJ.J., & StenbergC. (1981), ‘Perception, Appraisal, and Emotion: the Onset of Social Referencing’, in M.Lewis and L.Rosenblum, eds.,Infant Social Cognition: Empirical and Theoretical Considerations, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • CaracoT., & WolfL.L. (1975), ‘Ecological Determinants of Groups Sizes of Foraging Lions’,American Naturalist, 109, 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • CareyS. (1985),Conceptual Change in Childhood, Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChapaisB. (1988), ‘Rank Maintenance in Female Japanese Macaques: Experimental Evidence for Social Dependency’,Behavior, 104, 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChapaisB. (1992), ‘Role of Alliances in the Social Inheritance of Rank among Female Primates’, in A.Harcourt and F.B.M.DeWaal, eds.,Cooperation in Contests in Animals and Humans, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChencyD. L. & SeyfarthR.M. (1990),How Monkeys See the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChengP.W., & HolyoakK.J. (1985), ‘Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas’,Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChengP.W., & HolyoakK.J. (1989), ‘On the Natural Selection of Reasoning Theories’,Cognition, 33, 285–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChengP.W., HolyoakK.J., NisbettR.E., & OliverL.M. (1986), ‘Pragmatic vs Syntactic Approaches to Training Deductive Reasoning’,Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • ClarkE. V. (1973), ‘Non-Linguistic Strategies and the Acquisition of Word Meanings’,Cognition, 2, 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-BrockT.H. (1988), ‘Reproductive Success’, in T.H.Clutton-Brock, ed.,Reproductive Success, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-BrockT.H., & HarveyP.H. (1976), ‘Evolutionary Rules and Primate Societies’, in P.P.G.Bateson & R.A.Hinde, eds.,Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CookM. & MinetkaS. (1989), ‘Observational Conditioning of Fear to Fear-Relevant and Fear-Irrelevant Stimuli in Rhesus Monkeys’,Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 448–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • CosmidesL. (1989), ‘The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task’,Cognition, 31, 187–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (1994), ‘Beyond Intuition and Instinct Blindness: Toward an Evolutionarily Rigorous Cognitive Science’,Cognition, 50, 41–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoxJ.R. & GriggsR.A. (1982), ‘The Effects of Experience on Performance in Wason's Selection Task’,Memory & Cognition, 10, 496–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • CumminsD.D. (1995), ‘Naive Theories and Causal Deduction’,Memory & Cognition, 23, 646–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • CumminsD.D. (1996), ‘Evidence For the Innateness of Deontic Reasoning’,Mind & Language, 11, 160–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D.D. (In Press), ‘Evidence of Deontic Reasoning in 3- and 4-Year-Olds’,Memory & Cognition.

  • CumminsD.D., LubartT., AlsknisO., & RistR. (1991), ‘Conditional Reasoning and Causation’,Memory & Cognition, 19, 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • DarwinC. (1859),Origin of Species. Murray: London

    Google Scholar 

  • DasserV. (1985), ‘Cognitive Complexity in Primate Social Relationships’, in R.A.Hinde, A.N.Perret-Clemont, & J.Stevenson-Hinde, eds.,Social Relationships and Cognitive Development: Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DattaS.B. (1983a), ‘Relative Power and the Acquisition of Rank’, in R.A.Hinde, ed.,Primate Social Relationships, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DattaS.B. (1983b), ‘Relative Power and the Maintenance of Rank’, in R.A.Hinde ed.,Primate Social Relationships, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DattaS.B. (1983c), ‘Patterns of Agonistic Interference’, in R.A.Hinde ed.,Primate Social Relationships, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DewsburyD.A. (1982), ‘Dominance Rank, Copulatory Behavior and Differential Reproduction’,Quarterly Review of Biology, 57, 135–159

    Google Scholar 

  • DunbarR.I.M. (1992), ‘Neocortex Size as a Constraint on the Behavioral Ecology of Primates’,Journal of Human Evolution, 20, 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • DunbarR.I.M. (1993), ‘Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size, and Language in Humans’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • DunnJ. (1988),The Beginnings of Social Understanding, Oxford: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • EvansJ.St.B.T. (1989),Bias in Human Reasoning, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • FediganL. (1983), ‘Dominance and Reproductive Success in Primates’,Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 26, 91–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • FillenbaumS. (1975), ‘If: Some Uses’,Psychological Research, 37, 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • FillenbaumS. (1976), ‘Inducements: On Phrasing and Logic of Conditional Promises, Threats, and Warnings’,Psychological Research, 38, 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • FillenbaumS. (1978), ‘How to Do Some Things with If’, in J.W.Cotton, & R.L.Klatzky, eds.,Semantic Factors in Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GarciaJ., & KoellingR. (1966), ‘Relation of Cue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning’,Psychonomic Science, 4, 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • GigerenzerG., & HugK. (1992), ‘Domain-Specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating, and Perspective Change’,Cognition, 43, 127–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • GillanD.J. (1981), ‘Reasoning in the Chimpanzee: II. Transitive Inference’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioural Processes, 7, 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • GirottoV., LightP., & ColbournC.J. (1988), ‘Pragmatic Schemas and Conditional Reasoning in Children’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 40, 469–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodallJ. (1986),The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GriggsR.A., & CoxJ.R. (1983), ‘The Effects of Problem Content and Negation of Wason's Selection Task’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35a, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • HallK.R.L. (1964), ‘Aggression in Monkey and Ape Societies’, in J.Carthy and F.Ebling, eds.,The Natural History of Aggression, London: Academic Press, pp. 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • HallK.R.L., & DevoreI. (1965), ‘Baboon Social Behavior’, in I.Devore, ed.,Primate Behaviour, New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, pp. 53–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarcourtA.H. (1988), ‘Alliances in Contests and Social Intelligence’, in R.W.Byrne & A.Whiten, eds.,Machiavellian Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarcourtA.H., & DeWaalF.B.M. eds. (1992),Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarcourtA.H., & StewartK.J. (1987), ‘The Influence of Help in Contests on Dominance Rank in Primates: Hints from Gorillas’,Animal Behaviour, 35, 182–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P.L., & Nuñez, M. (In Press), ‘Understanding of Permission Rules by Preschool Children’Child Development.

  • HausfaterG. (1975), ‘Dominance and Reproduction in Baboons (Papio Cynocephalus): a Quantitative Analysis’,Contributions in Primatology, 7, 1–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • HilgardE.R., & BowerG.H. (1975),Theories of Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • HilpinenR. (1971),Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Boston: Reidel/Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • HilpinenR. (1981),New Studies in Deontic Logic, Boston: Reidel/Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • KeilF.C. (1994), ‘Explanation, Association, and the Acquisition of Word Meaning’,Lingua, 92, 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • KummerH. (1988), ‘Tripartite Relations in Hamadryas Baboons’, in R.W.Byrne & A.Whiten, eds.,Machiavellian Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeboeufB.J. (1974), ‘Male-Male Competition and Reproductive Success in Elephant Seals’,American Zoologist, 14, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeslieA.M. & KeebleS. (1987), ‘Do Six-Month-Old Infants Perceive Causality?’,Cognition, 25, 265–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • LightP., BlayeA., GillyM. & GirottoV. (1989), ‘Pragmatic Schemas and Logical Relations in 6-to 8-Year-Old Children’,Cognitive Development, 4, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • LightP., GirottoV. & LegrenziP. (1990), ‘Children's Reasoning on Conditional Promises and Permission’,Cognitive Development, 5, 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • ManktelowK.I. & OverD.E. (1991), ‘Social Roles and Utilities in Reasoning with Deontic Conditionals’,Cognition, 39, 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • ManktelowK.I., & OverD.E. (1995), ‘Deontic Reasoning’, in S.E.Newstead & J. St. B.Evans, eds.,Perspectives on Thinking and Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarrD. (1982),Vision: a Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard SmithJ. (1982),Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCannT.S. (1981), ‘Aggression and Sexual Activity of Male Southern Elephant Seals,Mirounga Leonina’,Journal of Zoology, 195, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigleB.O., & ChalmersM. (1977), ‘Are Monkeys Logical?’Nature, 267, 694–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNallyR. J. (1987), ‘Preparedness and Phobias: a Review’,Psychological Bulletin, 101, 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • MurphyG.L., & MedinD.L. (1985), ‘The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence’,Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • NishidaT. (1983), ‘Alpha Status and Agonistic Alliance in Wild Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes Schweinfurthü),Primates, 24, 318–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • OaksfordM. & ChaterN. (1994), ‘A Rational Analysis of the Selection Task as Optimal Data Selection’,Psychological Review, 101, 608–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • PackerC. (1977), ‘Reciprocal Altruism in Olive Baboons’,Nature, 265: 441–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • PiagetJ. (1952),The Origins of Intelligence in Children, New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PiagetJ. (1972),The Child's Conception of the World, Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • PolitzerG. & Nguyen-XuanA. (1992), ‘Reasoning about Conditional Promises and Warnings: Darwinian Algorithms, Mental Models, Relevance Judgments, or Pragmatic Schemas?’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 401–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prud'hommeJ. & ChapaisB. (1993), ‘Aggressive Interventions and Matrilineal Dominance Relations in Semifree-Ranging Barbary Macaques’,Primates, 34, 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • RabbieJ.M. (1992), ‘The Effect of Intragroup Cooperation and Intergroup Competition on In-Group and Out-Group Hostility’, in F.deWaal and A.H.Harcourt, eds.,Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • RescorlaR.A. & WagnerA.R. (1972), ‘A Theory of Pavlovian Conditioning: Variations in the Effectiveness of Reinforcement and Nonreinforcement’, in A.Black & W.F.Prokasy, eds.,Classical Conditioning: Current Research and Theory, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • RipsL.J. (1983), ‘Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning’.Psychological Review, 90, 38–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • RipsL.J. (1994),The Psychology of Proof, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RissD.C. & GoodallJ. (1977), ‘The Recent Rise to the Alpha-Rank in a Population of Free-Living Chimpanzees’,Folia Primatologica, 27, 134–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • RobinsonJ.G. (1982), ‘Intrasexual Competition and Mate Choice in Primates’,American Journal of Primatology, 1 (Supplement), 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • RumainB., ConnellJ. & BraineM.D.S., (1983), ‘Conversational Comprehension Processes Are Responsible for Reasoning Fallacies in Children as Well as Adults: If Is Not the Biconditional’,Developmental Psychology, 19, 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • SawaguchiT., & KudoH. (1990), ‘Neocortical Development and Social Structures in Primates’,Primates, 31, 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchallerG.B. (1972),The Serengeti Lion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SelanderR.K. (1972), ‘Sexual Selection and Dimorphism in Birds’, in B.Campbell, ed.,Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeligmanM.E.P. (1970), ‘On the Generality of the Law of Learning’,Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeligmanM.E.P. (1971), ‘Phobias and Preparedness’,Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeligmanM.E.P., & HagerJ.L., eds. (1972),Biological Boundaries of Learning, New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeyfarthR.M. (1976), ‘Social Relationships among Adult Female Monkeys’,Animal Behavior, 24, 917–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeyfarthR.M. & CheneyD.L. (1984), ‘Grooming, Alliances, and Reciprocal Altruism in Vervet Monkeys’,Nature, 308, 541–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • SilkJ.B. (1987), ‘Social Behavior in Evolutionary Perspective’, in B.B.Smuts, D.L.Cheney, R.M.Seyfarth, R.W.Wrangham, and T.T.Struhsaker, eds.,Primate Societies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SmithP.K. (1988), ‘The Cognitive Demands of Children's Social Interactions with Peers’, in R.W.Byrne & A.Whiten, eds.,Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • SmutsB. (1985),Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Hawthorne: Aldine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SojaS.N., CareyS., and SpelkeE.S. (1991), ‘Ontological Categories Guide Young Children's Inductions of Word Meaning: Object Terms and Substance Terms’,Cognition, 38, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • SpelkeE.S. (1994), ‘Initial Knowledge: Six Suggestions,’Cognition, 50, 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • StarkeyP., SpelkeE.S., & GelmanR. (1990), ‘Numerical Abstraction by Human Infants,’Cognition, 36, 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • SteinR.A. (1976), ‘Sexual Dimorphism in Crayfish Chelae: Functional Significance Linked to Reproductive Activities,’Canadian Journal of Zoology, 54, 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThompsonV.A. (1994), ‘Interpretational Factors in Conditional Reasoning’,Memory & Cognition, 22, 742–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • TriversR.L. (1971), ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism’,Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • TutinC.E.G. (1979), ‘Mating Patterns and Reproductive Strategies in a Community of Wild Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes Schweinfurtü)’,Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • UeharaS., Hiraiwa-HasegawaM., HosakaK., & HamaiM. (1994), ‘The Fate of Defeated Alpha Male Chimpanzees in Relation to Their Social Networks’,Primates, 35, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • VandellL., & WilsonK.S. (1987), ‘Infant's Interactions with Mother, Sibling, and Peer: Contrasts and Relations between Interaction Systems’,Child Development, 58, 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWaalF. (1982),Chimpanzee Politics. Baltimore. Johns-Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWaalF. (1988), ‘Chimpanzee Politics’, in R.W.Byrne, & A.Whiten, eds.,Machiavellian Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWaalF. (1989), ‘Food Sharing and Reciprocal Obligations among Chimpanzees’,Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 433–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWaalF. (1992), ‘Coalitions as Part of Reciprocal Relations in the Arnhem Chimpanzee Colony’, in A.H.Harcourt and F.DeWaal, eds.,Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • WasonP.C. (1968), ‘Reasoning about a Rule’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • WasonP.C., & Johnson-LairdP.N. (1972),Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content, London: Batesford.

    Google Scholar 

  • WasonP.C., & ShapiroD. (1971), ‘Reasoning and Mental Representation’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36a, 597–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • WattsC.R., & StokesA.W. (1971), ‘The Social Order of Turkeys’,Scientific American, 224, 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • WegE., & SmithV. (1993), ‘On the Failure to Induce Meager Offers in Ultimatum Games’,Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • WhitenA., & ByrneR.W. (1988), ‘The Manipulation of Attention in Primate Tactical Deception’, in R.W.Byrne & A.Whiten, eds.,Machiavellian Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • WoodruffG., & PremackD. (1979), ‘Intentional Communication in the Chimpanzee: The Development of Deception’,Cognition, 7, 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, California State University, 6000 J Street, 95819-6007, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Denise Dellarosa Cummins

Authors
  1. Denise Dellarosa Cummins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, D.D. Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of human reasoning. Mind Mach 6, 463–480 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389654

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389654

Key words

Search

Navigation