Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Compensation on Product Recommendations Made by Insurance Agents

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lawsuits alleging illegal and unethical insurance sales practices have received widespread publicity in recent years. Although many observers have argued that one source of ethical conflicts for insurance agents is the industry's reliance on straight commission compensation, there remains a paucity of empirical data to support the claim. Therefore, we tested whether different forms of compensation influence insurance agent recommendations of products. We obtained survey responses from 336 insurance agents. Respondents were presented with a composite sketch of a hypothetical client. Following this description, they were asked to identify which one of eight specified life insurance products they would recommend to the client. A between-groups design was employed to manipulate differences in compensation associated with the eight products. Results indicated that neither amount of coverage nor type of coverage (term life versus cash value) recommended was associated with compensation. However, an unanticipated finding was that amount of coverage recommended was significantly higher when the insured was male than when the insured was female.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, S. J. and T. S. Overton: 1977, ‘Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research 14, 396-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E.: 2001, The Practice of Social Research, 9th Edition (Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.: 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust(Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. K., R. Lal, V. Srinivasan and R. Staelin: 1985, ‘Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective’, Marketing Science 4, 267-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. M. and M. D. Forster: 1997, ‘An Analysis of Life Insurance Illustrations: Regulatory Implications of the Disparity Between Policy Yields Based on Illustrated Versus Actual Surrender Values’, Journal of Insurance Regulation 15, 480-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. W. and G. L. Frank: 1991a, ‘Business Ethics in the Insurance Industry’, Journal of the American Society of CLU and ChFC 45(May), 74-80.

  • Cooper, R. W. and G. L. Frank: 1991b, ‘Ethics in the Life Insurance Industry: The Issues, Helps, and Hindrances’, Journal of the American Society of CLU and ChFC 45(September), 54-66.

  • Cordell, D. M.: 1996, Fundamentals of Financial Planning(The American College, Bryn Mawr, PA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., E. N. Berkowitz and W. Rudelilus: 1980, ‘Ethical Problems in Field Sales Personnel’, MSU Business Topics 28, 11-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, K. L., J. K. Eastman and A. D. Eastman: 1996, ‘The Ethics of Insurance Professionals: Comparison of Personal Versus Professional Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 951-962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, H.: 1994, ‘Remunerating Information Providers: Commissions Versus Fees in Life Insurance’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 61, 425-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K. D., V. Howe and D. W. Hardigree: 1991, ‘Ethical Dilemmas Faced in the Selling of Complex Services’, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 11(4), 13-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B.: 1991, ‘The Ethical Implications of the Straight-Commission Compensation System-An Agency Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 757-766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B.: 1995a, ‘Ethics, Incentives, and Conflicts of Interest: A Practical Solution’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 465-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B.: 1995b, ‘The Unexplored Territory Linking Rewards and Ethical Behavior’, Business & Society 34, 34-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B.: 1996a, ‘Sales Agents and Clients: Ethics, Incentives, and a Modified Theory of Planned Behavior’, Human Relations 49, 51-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B.: 1996b, ‘Trust, Accountability, and Sales Agents' Dueling Loyalties’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6, 289-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, G.: 1990, ‘The Sales Process and the Paradoxes of Trust’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 671-679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinetti, M. A.: 2001, Promises, Promises: Ethics in the Insurance Industry, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.

  • Robertson, D. C. and E. Anderson: 1993, ‘Control System and Task Environment Effects on Ethical Judgment: An Exploratory Study of Industrial Salespeople’, Organization Science 4, 617-644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C. and W. T. Ross: 1995, ‘Decision-Making Processes on Ethical Issues: The Impact of a Social Contract Perspective’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 213-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.: 1973, ‘The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem’, American Economic Review 63, 134-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, H. D.: 1995, ‘Market Conduct Issues and the Transformation of the U.S. Life Insurance Business’, Journal of the American Society of CLU and ChFC 49(March), 36-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, E.: 2000, ‘Compensation Trail’, Advisor Today 95(August), 84-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1992, ‘Scenarios in Business Ethics Research: Review, Critical Assessment, and Recommendations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 137-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincuinas, J.: 2000, ‘Market Conduct Challenges’, Best's Review 100(April), 126-128.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cupach, W.R., Carson, J.M. The Influence of Compensation on Product Recommendations Made by Insurance Agents. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 167–176 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020355118527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020355118527

Navigation