Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:10:28.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No Right to Resist? Elise Reimarus's Freedom as a Kantian Response to the Problem of Violent Revolt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Lisa Curtis‐Wendlandt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the greatest woman intellectuals of eighteenth‐century Germany is Elise Reimarus, whose contribution to Enlightenment political theory is rarely acknowledged today. Unlike other social contract theorists, Reimarus rejects a people's right to violent resistance or revolution in her philosophical dialogue Freedom (1791). Exploring the arguments in Freedom, this paper observes a number of similarities in the political thought of Elise Reimarus and Immanuel Kant. Both, I suggest, reject violence as an illegitimate response to perceived political injustice in a way that opposes Locke's strong voluntarism and the absolutism of Hobbes. First, they emphasize the need to maintain the legal state as a precondition for the possibility of external right. Second, they share an optimistic view of the inherently “just” nature of the tripartite republican state. And finally, Reimarus and Kant both outline an alternative, nonviolent response to political injustice that consists in the freedom of public expression and a discourse on the moral enlightenment of man.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , Fall 2012 , pp. 755 - 773
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaslestad‐Lambertson, Katherine B. 1997. The transformation of civic identity and local patriotism in Hamburg, 1790 to 1815. PhD thesis, Department of History, University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign.Google Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline, and Green, Karen, eds. 2007. Virtue, liberty, and toleration: Political ideas of European women, 1400–1800. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline, and Green, Karen. 2009. A history of women's political thought in Europe, 1400–1700. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, Lenval A. 2008. Kant's moral teleology and “consequentialism.” In Law and peace in Kant's philosophy/Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants (Akten des X. Internationalen Kant‐Kongresses), ed. Kant‐Gesellschaft, E.V.et al. Vol. 1. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Curtis‐Wendlandt, Lisa.Legality and morality in the political thought of Elise Reimarus and Immanuel Kant. In Imagining citizenship: Political ideas of enlightenment women, ed. Curtis‐Wendlandt, Lisa, Gibbard, Paul, and Green, Karen (currently under consideration by Pickering and Chatto).Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, and Gearey, Adam. 2005. Critical jurisprudence: The political philosophy of justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dowd, Nancy E., and Jacobs, Michelle S., eds. 2003. Feminist legal theory: An anti‐essentialist reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. 1999. Freedom and constraint in Kant's Metaphysical Elements of Justice. History of Political Thought 20(2): 250–71.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. 2007. Duty, nature, right. Kant's response to Mendelssohn in Theory and Practice III. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(2): 223–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, Frank. 2002. Sovereignty and resistance: The development of the right of resistance in German natural law. In Natural law and civil sovereignty: Moral right and state authority in early modern political thought, ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 2005. Leviathan, ed. Rogers, G. A. J. and Schuhmann, K.2 vols. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian. 2007. The secularisation of the confessional state: The political thought of Christian Thomasius. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Kant: Political writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessnoff, Michael, ed. 1990. Social contract theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 2003. Two treatises of government and A letter concerning toleration, ed. Shapiro, Ian. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Bernd. 2009. Commentary on Kant's treatment of constitutional right (Metaphysics of Morals II: General Remark A; §§51–52, Conclusion, Appendix). In Kant's moral and legal philosophy, ed. Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reimarus, Elise. 178917922005. Versuch einer Erläuterung und Vereinfachung der Begriffe vom natürlichen Staatsrecht. In Almut Spalding, Elise Reimarus (1735–1805): The muse of Hamburg. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Reimarus, Johann A. H. [attributed]. 1791. Freiheit. Hamburg: Meyn.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1982. Will and political legitimacy: A critical exposition of social contract theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 2007. Kant against Hobbes in Theory and Practice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(2): 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2004. Authority and coercion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32(1): 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieveking, Heinrich. 1940. Elise Reimarus (1735–1805) in den geistigen Kämpfen ihrer Zeit. Zeitschrift des Vereins für Hamburgische Geschichte 39:86–138.Google Scholar
Spalding, Almut. 2005. Elise Reimarus (1735–1805): The muse of Hamburg; a woman of the German Enlightenment. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga. 2008. Kant's non‐voluntarist conception of political obligations: Why justice is impossible in the state of nature. Kantian Review 13(2): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Penny. 2009. Canon fodder: Historical women political thinkers. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar