Skip to main content
Log in

The Information Coding Classification (ICC): A Modern, Theory-Based Fully-Faceted, Universal System of Knowledge Fields

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction into the structure, contents and specifications (especially the Systematifier) of the Information Coding Classification, developed in the seventies and used in many ways by the author and a few others following its publication in 1982. Its theoretical basis is explained consisting in (1) the Integrative Level Theory, following an evolutionary approach of ontical areas, and integrating also on each level the aspects contained in the sequence of the levels, (2) the distinction between categories of form and categories of being, (3) the application of a feature of Systems Theory (namely the element position plan) and (4) the inclusion of a concept theory, distinguishing four kinds of relationships, originated by the kinds of characteristics (which are the elements of concepts to be derived from the statements on the properties of referents of concepts). Its special Subject Groups on each of its nine levels are outlined and the combinatory facilities at certain positions of the Systematifier are shown. Further elaboration and use have been suggested, be it only as a switching language between the six existing universal classification systems at present in use internationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For further details see Dahlberg (1974a).

  2. In the UDC with its 10 main classes this lead to subsume e.g. psychology under philosophy—as philosophy had found its position in the system already in 1876 whereas psychology came up by Dilthey only in the nineties of that century.

  3. Translation into German in Dahlberg (1974a, p. 231).

  4. It seems that these differences may be understood by the slow process of revising and developing the system to its full size throughout the years since it was taken over from the DDC by Otlet and LaFontaine in 1895.

  5. For this see my contribution in Dahlberg (1994b).

  6. In this contribution mentioned in Note 5, I distinguished also three other cases of domain interaction, namely (1) Multidisciplinarity, (2) Pluridisciplinarity and (3) Syndisciplinarity. In each case it were not fields which were combined but phenomena, like (1) water, or (2) security, or (3) a nanorobot. In case 1 “water” was looked at from the differing points of view of subject fields, in case 2 “security” was investigated for application in different environments and in case 3 a “nanorobot” was built with the help of experts from differing fields of knowledge.

  7. Editor’s note: These are functionally equivalent to what is called phase relationships in some faceted classification systems.

References

  • Dahlberg I (1973) Projekt Ordnungssystem der Wissensgebiete: Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen aus Projektphase I [Project Order system of knowledge fields: results and experiences of its part I]. DK-Mitt 17(3):9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1974a) Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung: Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens [Foundations of universal organization of knowledge: problems and possibilities of a universal classification system of knowledge]. Verlag Dokumentation, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1974b) Principles for the construction of a universal classification system. In: Wojciechowski JA (ed) Conceptual basis of the classification of knowledge: Ottawa conference 1971. Verlag Dokumentation, München, pp 450–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1974c) Wissensgebiete und ihre Benennungen [Knowledge fields and their names]. Muttersprache 84(6):420–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1977) Ontical structures and universal classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1978) A referent-oriented, analytical concept theory for interconcept. Int Classif 5(3):142–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1980) Wissensmuster und Musterwissen im Erfassen klassifikatorischer Ganzheiten [Knowledge patterns and patterns of knowledge in the recognition of classificatory totalities]. In: Dahlberg W (ed) Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster: Proc 4. Fachtagung, Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg. Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 294–315

  • Dahlberg I (1982) ICC, information coding classification: principles, structure and application possibilities. Int Classif 9(2):87–93. Also published together with the entire three-level scheme in Int Classif Indexing Bibliography (ICIB-1). Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 107–132

  • Dahlberg I (1990) Philosophical foundations of conceptual ordering systems. In: Negrini G, Farnesi T, Denediktsson D (eds) Documentary languages and databases: papers from the Rome conference. Ergon, Würzburg, pp 102–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1991) The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view. Int Study Conf Classif Res (ISCCR-91), Toronto

  • Dahlberg I (1992) The network of knowledge fields: conceptual systematization in action. In: Neelameghan A et al (eds) Cognitive paradigms in knowledge organization: second international ISKO conference, Madras (India). Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, pp 323–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg I (1994a) Domain interaction: theory and practice. In: Albrechtsen H, Oernager S (eds) Knowledge organization and quality management: third international ISKO conference, Copenhagen. Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 60–71

  • Dahlberg (1994b) Environment-related conceptual systematization. In: Stancikova P, Dahlberg I (eds) Environmental knowledge organization and information management: Proceedings first European ISKO conference, Bratislava. Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 84–94

  • Dahlberg I (1996a) The compatibility guidelines: a re-evaluation. In: Compatibility and integration of order systems: TIP/ISKO meeting 1995. Wydawnistowo SBP, Warsaw, pp 32–46

  • Dahlberg I (1996b) Library catalogs in the internet: switching for future subject access. In: Green, R (ed) Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings fourth international ISKO conference, Washington, DC. Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 155–164

  • Dahlberg I (1998) Classification structure principles: investigations, experiences, conclusions. In: Mustafa EL Hadi W, Maniez J, Pollitt SA (eds) Structures and relations in knowledge organization: proceedings Fifth international ISKO conference, Lille. Ergon, Würzburg, pp 79–88

  • Dahlberg I (2002) Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation. In: Budin G, Ohly HP (eds) Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings 8. Tagung Deutsche ISKO, Regensburg, Ergon, Würzburg, pp 3–13

  • Dahlberg I (2006) Knowledge organization: a new science? Knowl Org 33(1):11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Diemer A (1964) Grundriss der Philosophie, vol 2: Die philosophischen Sonderdisziplinen [Foundations of philosophy: the special disciplines of philosophy]. Hain, Meisenheim/Glan

  • Diemer A (1969) Versuch einer Systematik der allgemeinen Wörter [Attempt at constructing a system of general terms]. Arbeitsunterlage Sitzung Komitees Thesaurusforschung DGD. München, Düsseldorf

  • Diemer A (1970) Der Wissenschaftsbegriff im historischen und systematischen Zusammenhang [The concept of science in its historical and systematic relationship]. In: Diemer A (ed) Der Wissenschaftsbegriff. Hain, Meisenheim/Glan, pp 3–20

  • Dorking (1957) Dorking conference: conclusions and recommendations. In: Proceedings international study conference on classification for information retrieval. Aslib, London, pp 111–113

  • Feibleman JK (1954) The integrative levels in nature. Brit J Phil Sci 5(17):59–66. Also in Kyle B (ed) Focus on information. Aslib, London 1965, pp 27–41

  • Foskett DJ (1970) Classification for a general indexing language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group. Library Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann N (1964) Der Aufbau der realen Welt: Grundriss der allgemeinen Kategorienlehre, 3. Aufl. De Gruyter, Berlin

  • Negrini G (1992) Systematization of science and technology research. In: Neelameghan A et al (eds) Cognitive paradigms in knowledge organization: second international ISKO conference, Madras (India). Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, pp 293–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrini G, Adamo G (1996) The evolution of a concept system: reflections on case studies of scientific research, Italian literature and humanities computing. In: Green R (ed) Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings fourth international ISKO conference. Washington, DC, Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 275–283

  • Negrini G, Aschero B et al (1993) Systematifier: a guide for the systematization of Italian literature. In: Meder N, Jaenecke P, Schmitz-Esser W (eds) Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung Deutsche ISKO, Weilburg. Indeks, Frankfurt, pp 125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranaganathan SR (1933) Colon classification. Asia, Madras, London

  • Ranganathan SR (1967) Prolegomena to library classification, 3rd edn. Asia, Bombay

  • Shamurin EI (1967) Geschichte der bibliothekarisch-bibliographischen Klassifikation,` 2 vols. Verlag Dokumentation, München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingetraut Dahlberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahlberg, I. The Information Coding Classification (ICC): A Modern, Theory-Based Fully-Faceted, Universal System of Knowledge Fields. Axiomathes 18, 161–176 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-007-9026-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-007-9026-8

Keywords

Navigation