Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T09:16:57.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RACE, RIGHTS, AND HIGHER LAWS IN ANTEBELLUM AMERICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2006

BRUCE DAIN
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Utah

Extract

Susan M. Ryan, The Grammar of Good Intentions: Race and the Antebellum Culture of Benevolence, Cornell University Press, 2003

Gregg D. Crane, Race, Citizenship, and Law in American Literature, Cambridge University Press, 2002

Moral sympathy does not necessarily imply condescension. Try to do something about sympathy, cross the line to benevolence, try to improve someone else's lot in life, and that can too easily change. Reform can become coercion and intolerance. The needy can come to seem permanently debased. They can also trick or manipulate the benevolent. These ambiguities pose severe problems for anyone who wants to imagine a democratic politics based on morality. Does neediness make the needy incapable of self-reliance and citizenship? Does benevolence corrupt the giver? Who gets to decide what laws are moral? According to literary scholars Mary Ryan and Gregg Crane, antebellum American literature perceived these problems and in many cases quite self-consciously tried to resolve them.

Type
Review Essays
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)