Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reasons, Relevance and Salience: A Response to Hookway

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

This paper responds to Christopher Hookway’s article, “Reasons for Belief, Reasoning, Virtue.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Dancy (2004) Ethics Without Principles Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (2006): `Reasons for Belief, Reasoning, Virtue’, Philosophical Studies 130(1): 47–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Reading, RG6 6AA, Whiteknights, Reading, UK

    Jonathan Dancy

  2. Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, C3500, Austin, TX, 78712-0310, USA

    Jonathan Dancy

Authors
  1. Jonathan Dancy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Dancy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dancy, J. Reasons, Relevance and Salience: A Response to Hookway. Philos Stud 130, 71–79 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-3234-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-3234-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation