Skip to main content
Log in

The professional approach to engineering ethics: Five research questions

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that research for engineering ethics should routinely involve philosophers, social scientists, and engineers, and should focus for now on certain basic questions such as: Who is an engineer? What is engineering? What do engineers do? How do they make decisions? And how much control do they actually have over what they do?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris, Nigel G. E. (1994) Professional codes and Kantian duties, in: Chadwick, Ruth F. (ed.) Ethics and the Professions, Avebury, Aldershot, England, pp. 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alpern, Ken. (1983) Moral Responsibility for Engineers, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (Winter): 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schlossberger, Eugene. (1993) The Ethical Engineer (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, Mike W. and Roland Schinzinger. (1989) Ethics in Engineering, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grunwald, Armin. (2001) The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer’s Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda, Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman, Benjamin. (1978) A Meta-Ethics for Professional Morality, Ethics 89 (October): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman, Alan. (1980) The Moral Foundations of Professional Responsibility, Littlefield Adams, Totowa, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, Charles, Michael Pritchard, and Michael Rabins. (2000) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 2nd. edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ladd, John. (1982) Collective and Individual Responsibility in Engineering: Some Questions, in: Weil, V. (ed.) Beyond Whistleblowing: Defining Engineers’ Responsibilities, Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, USA, pp. 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luegenbiehl, Heinz C. (1991) Codes of Ethics and the Moral Education of Engineers, in: Johnson, Deborah G. (ed.), Ethical Issues in Engineering Ethics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, pp. 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whalley, Peter. (1991) Negotiating the Boundaries of Engineering: Professionals, Managers, and Manual Work, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 8: 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seeley, Bruce. (1984) The Scientific Mystique in Engineering: Highway Research at the Bureau of Public roads, 1918–1940, Technology and Culture 25 (October): 798–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, Michael. (1992) The Moral Legislature: Morality without an Archimedean Point. Ethics 102 (January): 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Report of Investigation into Allegations of Retaliation for Raising Safety and Quality of Work Issues Regarding Argonne National laboratory’s Integral Fast Reactor Project. (1991) Office of Nuclear Safety, U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, December.

  15. Perrucci, Robert and Joel E. Gerstl. (1969) Profession without Community: Engineers in American Society, Random House, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zussman, Robert. (1995) Mechanics of the Middle Class: Work and Politics Among American Engineers, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, Michael. (1998) Thinking like an Engineer, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DeGeorge, Richard. (1981) Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large Organizations, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1 (Spring): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Davis.

Additional information

Thanks to Michiel Brumsen for helpful comments on several earlier drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, M. The professional approach to engineering ethics: Five research questions. SCI ENG ETHICS 7, 379–390 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0060-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0060-4

Keywords

Navigation