Skip to main content
Log in

Free Acts and Robot Cats

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Ayer, A. (1954): ‘Freedom and Necessity’, in his Philosophical Essays, London: Macmillan, pp. 271-284. Reprinted in G. Watson (ed.), Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982, pp. 15-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (1958): ‘Making Something Happen’, in S. Hook (ed.), Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science, New York: New York University Press, pp. 15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. and Fodor, J. (1972): ‘What Psychological States Are Not’, The Philosophical Review 81, 159-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1980): ‘Materialism Without Reductionism: What Physicalism Does Not Entail’, in N. Block (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, vol. I, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 67-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1988): ‘How to Be a Moral Realist’, in G. Sayre-McCord (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 181-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D. (1988): ‘Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 17, 105-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daw, R. (1995): Free Will and Determinism: An Assessment of the Traditional Approach to the Compatibility Issue, doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. and Sterelny, K. (1987): Language and Reality, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K. (1983): ‘Kripke and Putnam on Natural Kind Terms’, in C. Ginet and S. Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge and Mind, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 84-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Double, R. (1991): The Non-Reality of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Double, R. (1996): Metaphilosophy and Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1955): ‘Divine Omnipotence and Human Freedom’, in A. Flew and A. MacIntyre (eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, London: SCM Press, pp. 144-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1956): ‘Philosophy and Language’, in A. Flew (ed.), Essays in Conceptual Analysis, London: MacMillan, pp. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (1996): ‘The Mad Scientist Meets the Robot Cats: Compatibilism, Kinds, and Counterexamples’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56, 333-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651): Leviathan.

  • Hobbes, T. (1654): Of Liberty and Necessity.

  • Honderich, T. (1988): A Theory of Determinism: The Mind, Neuroscience, and Life-Hopes, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1748): An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

  • Jackson, F. (1998): From Metaphysics to Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1972): ‘Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 253-355, plus appendices. Reprinted as Naming and Necessity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980. Page numbers in this paper refer to the reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePore, E. and Loewer, B. (1989): ‘More on MakingMind Matter’, Philosophical Topics 17, 175-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1978): ‘Mental States, Natural Kinds and Psychophysical Laws’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52, 195-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereboom, D. and Kornblith, H. (1991) ‘The Metaphysics of Irreducibility’, Philosophical Studies 63, 125-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1967): ‘Psychological Predicates’, in W. Capitan and D. Merrill (eds.), Art, Mind, and Religion, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 37-48. Reprinted as ‘The Nature of Mental States’, in Putnam's Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, pp. 429-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1970): ‘Is Semantics Possible?’, in H. Kiefer and M. Munitz (eds.), Language, Belief, andMetaphysics, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 50-63. Reprinted in Putnam's Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, pp. 139-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1973): ‘Meaning and Reference’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 699-711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975): ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 131-193. Reprinted in Putnam's Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, pp. 215-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M. (1939): ‘When Is a Man Responsible?’, in his Problems of Ethics, D. Rynin (trans.),New York: Prentice-Hall, pp. 143-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1977): ‘Introduction’, in S. Schwartz (ed.), Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 13-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1978): ‘Putnam on Artifacts’, The Philosophical Review 87, 566-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1980): ‘Natural Kinds and Nominal Kinds’, Mind 89, 182-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Inwagen, P. (1983):An Essay on Free Will, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daw, R., Alter, T. Free Acts and Robot Cats. Philosophical Studies 102, 345–357 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010350211589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010350211589

Navigation