Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

THE STATUS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION RESEARCH AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE TEACHING AND LEARNING OF THE CONCEPT OF IDEALIZATION IN CHEMISTRY

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review of the chemical education research literature suggests that the term constructivism is used in two ways: experience-based constructivism and discipline-based constructivism. These two perspectives are examined as an epistemology in relation to the teaching and learning of the concept of idealization in chemistry. It is claimed that experience-based constructivism is powerless to inform the origin of such concepts in chemistry and while discipline-based constructivism can admit such theoretical concepts as idealization it does not offer any unique perspectives that cannot be obtained from other models. Chemical education researchers do not consistently appeal to constructivism as an epistemology or as a teaching/learning perspective and it is shown that, while it draws attention to worthwhile teaching/learning strategies, it cannot be considered as foundational to chemical education research and tends to be used more as an educational label than as an undergirding theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrhenius S. (1978). Development of the Theory of Electrolytic Dissociation, 1904. In: Williams L.P., Steffens H.J. (eds), The History of Science in Western Civilization Volume III. Lanham, University Press of America, pp. 299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins P.W., Beran J.A. (1992). General Chemistry, 2nd edn. New York, W.H. Freeman

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology: a cognitive view. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell B.F. (1986). The Form 1–5 Science Review-Effecting Change. New Zealand Science Teacher 48:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang R. (1994). Chemistry, 5th edn. New York, McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin C., Brown D.E. (2000). Learning Deeply in Science: An Analysis and Reintegration of Deep Approaches in Two Case Studies of Grade 8 Students. Research in Science Education 30(2):173–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu M., Chou C., Liu C. (2002). Dynamic Processes of Conceptual Change: Analysis of Constructing mental Models of Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(8):688–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidowitz B., Rollnick M. (2003). Enabling Metacognition in the Laboratory: A Case Study of Four second year University Chemistry Students. Research in Science Education 33(1):43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vos W., Verdonk A.H. (1985a). A New Road to Reactions Part 1. Journal of Chemical Education 62(3):238–240

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos W., Verdonk A.H. (1985b). A New Road to Reactions Part 2. Journal of Chemical Education 62(8):648–649

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos W., Verdonk A.H. (1986). A New Road to Reactions Part 3: Teaching the Heat Effect of Reactions. Journal of Chemical Education 63(11):972–974

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos W., Verdonk A.H. (1987a). A New Road to Reactions Part 4: The Substance and its Molecules. Journal of Chemical Education 64(8):692–694

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos W., Verdonk A.H. (1987b). A New Road to Reactions Part 5: The Element and its Atoms. Journal of Chemical Education 64(12):1010–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver R., Asoko H., Leach J., Mortimer E., Scott P. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher 23(7):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham P.J. (1994). Beginning to Teach Chemistry. In: Fensham P.J., Gunstone R.F., White R.T. (eds), The Content of Science-A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. London, The Falmer Press, pp. 14–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere R.N. (1988). Explaining Science-A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert J.K., De Jong O., Justi R., Treagust D.F., Van Driel J.H. (2002). Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academin Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasstone S., Lewis D. (1963). Elements of Physical Chemistry, 2nd edn. London, Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins D. (1994). Constructivism: Some History. In: Fensham P.J., Gunstone R.F., White R.T. (eds), The Content of Science-A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. London, The Falmer Press, pp. 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson M.G., Hewson P.W. (1983). Effect of Instruction using Students’ Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Change Strategies on Science Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20(8):731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins E.W. (2000). Constructivism in School Science Education: Powerful Model or the Most Dangerous Intellectual Tendency?. Science and Education 9(6):599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz J.C., Treichel P. (1996). Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity, 3rd edn. Fort Worth, Saunders

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G.N., Randall M. (1961). Thermodynamics, 2nd edn. New York, McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock R. (2002). Does science education research count?. School Science Review 84(307):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsbach A., Tobin K. (1992). Constructivism as a Referent for Science Teaching. NARST Newsletter 30:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterton W.L., Hurley C.N. (2001). Chemistry-Principles and Reactions, 4th edn. Fort Worth, Harcourt

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M.R. (1997). Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education. Science and Education 6(1–2):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M.R. (2000). Editorial. Science and Education 9(6):491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nola R. (1997). Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique. Science and Education 6(1–2):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak J.D., Gowin D.B. (1984). Learning How To Learn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn J. (1997). Constructivist Metaphors of Learning Science. Science and Education 6(1–2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead J., Williams G.M. (1994). Chemistry-the Molecular Science. St.Louis, Mosby

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrucci R.H., Harwood W.S. (1993). General Chemistry-Principles and Modern Applications, 6th edn. New york, Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D.C. (1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Researcher 24:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri E.R. (2003). Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education Research. Journal of Chemical Education 80(5):468–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott P., Asoko H., Driver R., Emberton J. (1994). Working from Children’s Ideas: Planning and Teaching a Chemistry Topic from a Constructivist Perspective. In: Fensham P.J., Gunstone P., White R. (eds), The Content of Science. London, The Falmer Press, pp. 201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E.B. (1990). Basic Chemical Thermodynamics, 4 edn. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber K. (2002). Chemical Misconceptions-Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure, Volume 1. London, Royal Society of Chemistry

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele R.B., Treagust D.F. (1994). An Interpretative Examination of High School Chemistry Teachers’ Analogical Explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31(3):227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele R.B. (1995). Alternative Approaches to the teaching of chemical equilibrium using water as an example. In: Hand B., Prain V. (eds), Teaching and Learning in Science-The Constructivist Classroom. Marrickville, Harcourt Brace, pp. 155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G.P., McRobbie C.J. (2001). Using a metaphor for Learning to Improve Students’ Metacognition in the Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(2):222–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien L.T., Roth V., Kampmeier J.A. (2002). Implementation of a Peer-Led Team Learning Instructional Approach in an Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(7):606–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umland J.B., Bellama J.M. (1999). General Chemistry, 3rd edn. Pacific Grove, Brooks/Cole

    Google Scholar 

  • White R.T. (1988). Learning Science. New York, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten K.W., Davis R.E., Peck M.L. (2000). General Chemistry with Qualitative Analysis, 6th edn. Philadelphia, Saunders

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert L. (1992). The Unnatural Nature of Science. London, Faber and Faber

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin C. de Berg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, K.C.d. THE STATUS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION RESEARCH AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE TEACHING AND LEARNING OF THE CONCEPT OF IDEALIZATION IN CHEMISTRY. Found Chem 8, 153–176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-006-9010-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-006-9010-1

Keywords

Navigation