Abstract
When do organizations decide to ‘adopt’ a given social issue such that they come to acknowledge it in their patterns of action and communication? Traditional answers to this question have focused either on the characteristics of the issue itself, or on the traits of the focal organization. In many cases, however, a firm’s decision to adopt or ignore an issue is not a straightforward function of firm or issue characteristics. Instead, we view issue adoption as a socially constructed process of information exchange between parties that are involved in the emergence and evolution of the issue, mediated by third-party organizations. We refer to this process as the infomediary process and these latter organizations as ‘infomediaries,’ after the information mediation and brokerage roles they play in the social processes linking social issues to organizational impact. We present a concise theoretical model of how infomediaries establish credible linkages between focal organizations and social issues. The thrust of the model is that the infomediation process, rather than the issue or firm characteristics, is what really drives firm-level issue adoption decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525. doi:10.2307/256973
Bigelow, B., Fahey, L., & Mahon, J.F.1991. Political strategy and issues evolution: A framework for analysis and action. In K. Paul (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics and Politics: 1–26. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
Bollen, K.A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Boyle, T.P. (2001). Intermedia Agenda Setting in the 1996 Presidential Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 26–44.
Breen, M.J. (1997). A Cook, A Cardinal, His Priests, and the Press: Deviance as a Trigger for Intermedia Agenda Setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 348–356.
Carter, S.M., & Deephouse, D.L. (1999). ‘Tough talk’ and ‘soothing speech:’ A comparison of reputations for being tough and being good. Corporate Reputation Review, 2, 308–332. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540089
Chase, W.H. 1984. Issue management: Origins of the future. Stamford, CT: Issue Action Publishers.
Chen, C.C., & Meindl, J.R. (1991). The construction of leadership imaged in the popular press: The case of Donald Burr and People Express. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 521–551. doi:10.2307/2393273
Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117. doi:10.2307/258888
Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G.1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Dalton, R.J., Beck, P.A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 Presidential election. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 111–126. doi:10.2307/2585932
Danielian, L.H., & Page, B.I. (1994). The heavenly chorus: Interest group voices on TV news. American Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 1056–1078. doi:10.2307/2111732
Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and L. Donaldson: 1997, ‘Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management’. Academy of Management Review 22(1), 20–47. doi:10.2307/259223
Deephouse, D. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112. doi:10.1177/014920630002600602
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887
Downs, A. 1972. The issue-attention cycle and the political economy of improving our environment. In J. S. Bain, & W. F. Ilchman (Eds.), The political economy of environmental control: 9–34. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O’Neill, R.M., & Lawrence, K.A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716–736. doi:10.2307/3069412
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557
Elsbach, K.D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57–88. doi:10.2307/2393494
Emerson, R.M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–40. doi:10.2307/2089716
Epstein, E.M. 1969. The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Etzioni, A. 1975. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlates (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Fombrun, C.J. 1996. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324
Fombrun, C.J., & van Riel, C.B.M.2003. Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205. doi:10.2307/259074
Galtung, J., & Holboe Ruge, M. (1965). The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64–91. doi:10.1177/002234336500200104
Gans, H.J. 1980. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York: Vintage Books.
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47. doi:10.2307/258627
Haynes, A.A., & Rhine, S.L. (1998). Attack politics in presidential nomination campaigns: An examination of the frequency and determinants of intermediated negative messages against opponents. Political Research Quarterly, 51(3), 691–721.
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C.L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 53–78. doi:10.1086/228951
Hirsch, P.M. 1977. Occupational, organizational and institutional models in mass communication. In P. Hirsch, P. V. Miller, & F. G. Kline (Eds.), Strategies for Communication Research: 13–42. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hoffman, A.J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414–434. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.414.10639
Jones, T.M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. doi:10.2307/258867
Jones, T.M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G.A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.
Lamertz, K., Martens, M.L., & Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. (2003). Issue evolution: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 82–93. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540192
Mahon, J. F., P. P. M. A. R. Heugens and K. Lamertz: 2004, ‘Social Networks and Nonmarket Strategy’, Journal of Public Affairs 4(1) (forthcoming)
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
McQuail, D. (1985). Sociology of mass communication. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 93–111. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.000521
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi:10.2307/259247
Molotch, H. and M. Lester: 1974, ‘News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals’, American Sociological Review 39(February), 101–112. doi:10.2307/2094279
Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1975). Accidental news: The great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. American Journal of Sociology, 81(2), 235–260. doi:10.1086/226073
Mutz, D.C. (1994). Contextualizing personal experience: The role of the mass media. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 689–714. doi:10.2307/2132188
Page, B. I.: 1996, ‘The Mass Media as Political Actors’, Political Science & Politics 29(March), 20–24
Perrow, C. 1986. Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). London: Random House.
Pfeffer, J. 1981. Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3: 1–52. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Pollock, T.G., & Rindova, V.P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.
Powell, W. W.: 1998, ‘Learning from collaboration: knowledge and networds in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries’, California Management Review 40(3), 228–240.
Rindova, V.P., & Fombrun, C.J. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 691–710.
Rogers, E.M., Dearing, J.W., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda setting research. The Journal of Communication, 43, 68–84. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01263.x
Rowley, T.J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. doi:10.2307/259248
Rowley, T.J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
Scott, W.R. 1987. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Shoemaker, P.J., & Reese, S.D.1996. Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2d ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Sigal, L.V. (1978). Newsmen and campaigners: Organization men make the news. Political Science Quarterly, 93(3), 465–470. doi:10.2307/2149535
Sigelman, L. (1973). Reporting the news: An organizational analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 132–151. doi:10.1086/225511
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J.I.1987. Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610. doi:10.2307/258788
Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tuchman, G. (1974). Making news by doing work: Routinizing the unexpected. American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 110–131. doi:10.1086/225510
Tuchman, G. 1978. Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Wartick, S.L., & Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. (2003). Guest editorial: Future directions for issues management. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 7–18. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186
Wartick, S.L., & Mahon, J.F. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business & Society, 33(3), 293–311. doi:10.1177/000765039403300304
Weber, M. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
Weick, K.E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Woolley, J.T. (2000). Using media-based data in studies of politics. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 156–173. doi:10.2307/2669301
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deephouse, D.L., Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. Linking Social Issues to Organizational Impact: The Role of Infomediaries and the Infomediary Process. J Bus Ethics 86, 541–553 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9864-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9864-3