Abstract
This paper concerns one of the undecided disputes of modern moral philosophy: the possibility of moral dilemmas. Whereas proponents of the possibility of moral dilemmas often appeal to moral experience, many opponents refer to ethical theory and deontic logic. My aim in this paper is to clarify some of the tension between moral experience and ethical theory with respect to moral dilemmas. In Part One I try to show that a number of logical arguments against the possibility of moral dilemmas, though apparently very different, turn out to be basically the same, as they are all based on the following concept of ‘ought’: if A ought to be done, doing B is impermissible and doing A itself is permissible. In Part Two I present an overview of several definitions of moral dilemmas that have been given by proponents of moral dilemmas: definitions that define moral dilemmas in terms of oughts and definitions that define them in terms of reasons. I conclude that, while ‘reason’ is to weak, ‘ought’ is too strong a concept to define moral dilemmas with. In this way, the arguments from Part One create a logical problem for proponents of the possibility of moral dilemmas to define moral dilemmas.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brink, D.O., Moral Conflict and Its Structure, Philosophical Review 2 (1994), pp. 215–247.
Chang, R., Introduction, in R. Chang (ed.) Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 1–34.
Dancy, J., Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
Donagan, A., Moral Dilemmas, Genuine And Spurious: A Comparative Anatomy, in H.E. Mason (ed.) Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 11–22.
Gowans, C.W., Innocence Lost: An Examination of Inescapable Wrongdoing. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Greenspan, P., Practical Guilt: Moral Dilemmas, Emotions and Social Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Sartre, J.-P., L'Existentialisme est un Humanisme. Paris: Nagel, 1959.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Moral Dilemmas. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
Vallentyne, P., Two Types of Moral Dilemmas, Erkenntnis 30 (1989), pp. 301–308.
Williams, B.A.O., Ethical Consistency, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 39 (suppl), (1965), pp. 103–124.
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Haan, J. The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4, 267–284 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011895415846
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011895415846