Skip to main content
Log in

Honor and Public Opinion

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Honor has been an indispensable reference in the life of individuals and societies throughout the course of human history. As a basic concern of men and women, the phenomenon already appears in the earliest literary testimonies. The heroes of the Greek, Roman or German epic poems adapt their behavior to the demands of this particular deity, honor. Literature, at any time, in any culture, in any language, makes constant use of honor as an effective dramatic element. The recurrent presence is certainly a reflection of the actual significance the phenomenon of honor had in everyone’s life. This essay clarifies why honor is given such importance; why it has been considered to be more valuable for the individual than his/her own life. To this end, the mention of public opinion is unavoidable. This phenomenon, in its social psychological conception, is the key that permits us to enlighten the labyrinth of honor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. (1975). Ethica nicomachea, magna moralia, ethica eudemia. In W. D. Ross (Ed.), The works of Aristotle (Vol. IX) (W. D. Ross, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 330 B.C.E.).

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1955). Relationship between shame and guilt in the socializing process. Psychological Review, 62, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. (1975). Über den Begriff der Ehre und seinen Niedergang (On the concept of honor and its decadence). In P. L. Berger, B. Berger, & H. Kellner (Eds.), Das Unbehagen in der Modernität (pp. 43–91). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollnow, O. F. (1962). Einfache Sittlichkeit. Kleine philosophische Aufsätze (Simple morality: Short philosophical essays). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis. Auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. (Outline of a theory of practice) (B. Schwibs, Trans.). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Sozialer Raum und Klassen. Leçon sur la leçon. Zwei Vorlesungen (Social space and classes) (B.Schwibs, Trans.). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

  • Dostoewsky, F. M. (1946). The possessed (C. Garnett, Trans.). London: Roy Publishers. (Original work published in 1872).

  • Egenter, R. (1937). Von christlicher Ehrenhaftigkeit (On Christian honorability). München: Kösel-Pustet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1969). Die höfische Gesellschaft (Sophisticated society). Neuwied: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus von Rotterdam (1981). Enchiridion militis christiani. An English version (A. M. O’Donnell, Ed. Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1516).

  • Fontane, T. (1958). Effie Briest. In Theodor Fontane Werke (Vol. 2). Berlin: Tempel Verlag. (Original work published in 1895).

  • Gehlen, A. (1969). Moral und Hypermoral. Eine pluralistische Ethik (Moral and hypermoral. A pluralistic approach to ethics). Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, A. (1983). Zur Systematik der Anthropologie (Toward a systematics of the anthropology). In Arnold Gehlen Gesamtausgabe (Vol. IV). Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum Verlag. (Original work published in 1963).

  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1965). Strukturwander der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society). Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1939). Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik (Lectures on aesthetics). In H. Glockner (Ed.), Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Sämtliche Werke (Vol. 13). Stuttgart: Suhrkamp. (Original work published in 1845).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1925). The prince (H. Thomson, Trans.). New York: The Heritage Press. (Original work published in 1532).

  • Murdock, G. P. (1949). Our primitive contemporaries. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1969). Zur Genealogie der Moral: Eine Streitschrift (On the genealogy of morals). In K. Schlechta (Ed.), Friedrich Nietzsche Werke. München: Hanser. (Original work published in 1887).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion–our social skin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, H. (1974). Pflicht und Neigung. Die Grundlagen der Sittlichkeit (Duty and inclination: The foundations of morality). Meisenheim am Glan: Westkultur Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. A. (1969). Social control: A survey of the foundations of order. Cleveland: The Press of Case Reserve University. (Original work published in 1901).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1990). Julie or the new Heloise. Letters of two lovers who live in a small town at the foot of the Alps (Ph. Stewart & J. Vaché, Trans.). In R. D. Masters (Ed.), The collected writings of Rousseau. Hanover: University Press of New England. (Original work published in 1761).

  • Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology: Discourse, emotion, and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1955). Die Idole der Selbsterkenntnis (Idols of self-perception). In Vom Umsturz der Werte. Abhandlungen und Absätze (pp. 213–192). Bern: Francke Verlag. (Original work published in 1919).

  • Scheler, M. (1957). Über Scham und Schamgefühl (On shame and the sense of shame). In Schriften aus dem Nachlass (pp. 65–154). Bern: Francke Verlag.

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 56–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A. (1988). Parerga und Paralipomena: Kleine philosophische Schriften (Parerga und Paralipomena: Short philosophical essays). In A. Hübscher (Ed.), Arthur Schopenhauer Sämtliche Werke (Vol. 5). München: Goldmann. (Original work published in 1851).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1922). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (Sociology: Survey of the different forms of socialization). München: Duncker & Humboldt. (Original work published in 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1964). Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft: Eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffen (Introduction into the science of morals: A critique of fundamental concepts in Ethics). Aalen: Scientia Verlag. (Original work published in 1892).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy, L. N. (1982). War and peace (R. Edmonds, Trans.). New York: Penguin Classics. (Original work published in 1869).

  • Vogt, L. (1997). Zur Logik der Ehre in der Gegenwartsgesellschaf: Differenzierung, Macht, Integration (Toward a logic of honor in contemporary society: Differentiation, power, integration). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, M. (1927). Die Ehre als Quelle des sittlichen Lebens (Honor as source of ethical life). Langensalza: Beyer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Carlos Del Ama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Ama, J.C. Honor and Public Opinion. Hum Stud 32, 441–460 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9133-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9133-1

Keywords

Navigation