Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Remodeling the Past

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In some of the papers in which she develops and defends the mental modelview of thought experiments in physics, Nersessian expresses the belief that her account has implications for thought experiments in other domains as well. In this paper, I argue, firstly, that counterfactual reasoning has a legitimate place in historical inquiry, and secondly, that the mental model view can account for such "alternative histories".

I proceed as follows. Firstly, I review the main accounts of thought experiments in physics and point at some explanatory advantages of the mental model view. Subsequently, I argue that historians cannot dispense with counterfactual reasoning altogether and qualify a number of principled objections against the explicit use of alternative histories for theoretical purposes. Finally, I show that the mental model view can account for such thought experiments in history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • V.A. Bell P.N. Johnson-Laird (1998) ArticleTitleA Model Theory of Modal Reasoning Cognitive Science 22 22–51 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80034-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bishop (1998) An Epistemological Role for Thought Experiments N. Shanks (Eds) Idealization IX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics Rodopi Amsterdam 19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Blom W. Callebaut T. Nijhuis (1989) ArticleTitleModalities and Counterfactuals in History and the Social Sciences: Some Preliminary Reflections Philosophica 44 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Brown (1991) The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bulhof (1999) ArticleTitleWhat If? Modality and History History and Theory 38 145–168 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0018-2656.00084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Callebaut (1993) Taking the Naturalistic Turn or How Real Philosophy of Science is Done University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • E.H. Carr (1964) What is History Knopf New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Demandt (1986) Ungeschehene Geschichte Vondenhoeck & Ruprecht Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Duhem (1962) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory Atheneum New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elster (1978) Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elster (1983) Explaining Technical Change Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Ferguson (Eds) (1997) Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals Picador London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Feyerabend (1978) Against Method Verso London

    Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Fisher (1970) Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought Harper & Row New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fogel (1964) Railroads and American Economic Growth Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Forge (1991) Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Physical Science T. Horowitz G.J. Massey (Eds) Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Maryland 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • T.S. Gendler (1998) ArticleTitleGalileo and the Indispensability of Scientific Thought Experiment Brit. J. Phil. Sci 49 397–424

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Goldhagen (1996) Hitler’s Willing Executioners Knopf New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Häggqvist (1996) Thought Experiments in Philosophy Stockholm Studies in Philosophy Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hawthorn (1991) Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A.D. Irvine (1991) On the Nature of Thought Experiments in Scientific Reasoning T. Horowitz G.J. Massey (Eds) Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Maryland 149–165

    Google Scholar 

  • P.N. Johson-Laird Y. Goldvarg (1997) How to Make the Possible Seem Possible M.G. Shafto P. Langley (Eds) Proceedings of the nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 354–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.F. Khong (1996) Confronting Hitler and Its Consequences P.E. Tetlock A. Belkin (Eds) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ 95–118

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Koyré (1968) Metaphysics and Measurement Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1964, A Function for Thought Experiments. In L’aventure de l’esprit: Mélanges Alexandere Koyré II. Paris: Hermann, 307–334.

  • E. Mach (1976) Knowledge and Error Reidel Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. McAllister (1996) ArticleTitleThe Evidential Significance of Thought Experiment in Science Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci 27 233–250

    Google Scholar 

  • P.D. McClelland (1975) Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics, and the Ne Economic History Cornell University Press Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Miščević (1992) ArticleTitleMental Models and Thought Experiments Int. Stud. Phil. Sci 6 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • N.J. Nersessian (1998) In the Theoretician’s Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling D. Anapolitanos A. Baltas S. Tsinorema (Eds) Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science Rowman & Little-field Publishers Lanham, MD 260–272

    Google Scholar 

  • N.J. Nersessian (1999) Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change L. Magnani N.J. Nersessian P. Thagard (Eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York, NY 5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Norton (1991) Thought Experiments in Einstein’s Work T. Horowitz G.J. Massey (Eds) Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Maryland 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A.C. Parker (2000) Churchill and Appeasement Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Rescher (1991) Thought Experimentation in Presocratic Philosophy T. Horowitz G.J. Massey (Eds) Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Maryland 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Ringer (1997) Max Weber’s Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • W.R. Shea (1972) Galileo’s Intellectual Revolution Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sylvan S. Majeski (1998) ArticleTitleA Methodology for the Study of Historical Counterfactuals International Studies Quarterly 42 79–108 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0020-8833.00070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.E. Tetlock A. Belkin (1996) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives P.E. Tetlock A. Belkin (Eds) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • H.R. Trevor-Roper (1981) History and Imagination H. Lloyd-Jones V. Pearl B. Worden (Eds) History and Imagination: Essays in honour of H.R. Trevor-Roper Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd London 356–369

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Tucker (1999) ArticleTitleHistoriographical Counterfactuals and Historical Contingency History and Theory 38 264–276 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0018-2656.00090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.P. Turner R.A. Factor (1994) Max Weber: The Lawyer as Social Thinker Routledge New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Wagner H. Zipprian (1985) ArticleTitleMethodologie und Ontologie: Zum Problem kausaler Erklärung bei Max Weber Zeitschrift für Soziologie 14 115–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1949, Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Historical Explanation. In The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press of Glencoe, 164–188.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universiteit Gent Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte Vakgroep Wijsbegeerte en Moraalwetenschap Centrum voor Logica en Wetenschapsfilosofie, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000, Gent, Belgium

    Tim De Mey

Authors
  1. Tim De Mey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim De Mey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Mey, T. Remodeling the Past. Found Sci 10, 47–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3005-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3005-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation