Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The sociological tradition of Hungarian philosophy

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this introductory paper I sketch the tradition, several early aspects of which are discussed in the following essays and reviews. I introduce the main figures whose work initiated and maintained the sociological orientation in Hungarian philosophy thereby tracing its evolution. I suggest that its sociological outlook, if taken to be a characteristic tendency that gives Hungarian philosophy its distinctive flavour, provides us with the framework of a possible narrative about the history of Hungarian philosophy in the broader context of Central European philosophy. This narrative, in turn, suggests a way of integrating the latter into the history of Western philosophy rather than restricting its scope to a handful of canonical works only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altrichter, F. (1976). Reneszánsz, reformáció, kartezianizmus. In his Észérvek. Budapest: Atlantisz, 1993.

  • Antal, F. (1947). Florentine painting and its social background. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babits, M. (1910). A lélek és a formák. Nyugat, 3(21), 1563–1565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balázs, B. (1982/1984). Schriften zum Film (Vol. 2). München, Vienna: Hanser.

  • Bence, Gy. (1990). Kritikai előtanulmányok egy marxista tudományfilozófiához. Budapest: MTA Filozófiai Intézete.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, L. (1983). The young Lukács. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, L. (1991). Exile and social thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, L. (2001). Seeing red: Hungarian intellectuals in exile and the challenge of communism. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, L. (2004). Arnold Hauser and the retreat from Marxism. In T. Demeter (Ed.), Essays on Wittgenstein and Austrian philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeter, T. (1999). From classical studies towards epistemology: The work of József Balogh. Studies in East European Thought, 51, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeter, T. (2004). The many faces of sociological interpretation: The unity of Nyíri’s thought. In T. Demeter (Ed.), Essays on Wittgenstein and Austrian philosophy. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehér, M. (1995). Changing tools. Budapest: Akadémiai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, G. (1999). Das hoffnungslose Meisterwerk. Cuxhaven: Traude Junghans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, R. (1979). Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie: Variationen über ein Thema. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, R. (1981). Wittgenstein and Austrian philosophy. In J. C. Nyíri (Ed.), Austrian philosophy: Studies and texts. München: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, R. (1986). Fragen zu Wittgenstein und Aufsätze zur Österreichischen Philosophie. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, I. (1932). Racionális fejlődés és írásbeliség. In his Technika, művelődés. Budapest: História.

  • Hajnal, I. (1933). Írásbeliség, intellektuális réteg és európai fejlődés. In his Technika, művelődés. Budapest: História.

  • Hauser, A. (1918). Az esztétikai rendszerezés problémája. In É. Karádi & E. Vezér (Eds.), A Vasárnapi Kör. Budapest: Gondolat, 1980.

  • Hell, J., Lendvai, L. F., & Perecz, L. (2000/2001). A magyar filozófia a XX. században (Vol. 2). Budapest: Áron.

  • Heller, A. (1978). Renaissance man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janos, A. C. (1982). The politics of backwardness in Hungary 1825–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. M. (1981). Cultural criticism as a neglected topic in Austrian studies. In J. C. Nyíri (Ed.), Austrian philosophy: Studies and texts. München: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karácsony, S. (1939). A magyar észjárás. Budapest: Magvető, 1985.

  • Kolnai, A. (1920). Psychoanalyse und Soziologie: Zur Psychologie von Masse und Gesellschaft. Vienna, Leipzig: Psychoanalytischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolnai, A. (1999). Political memoirs. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1947). Modern fizika, modern társadalom. In G. Kemény (Ed.), Továbbképzés és demokrácia. Budapest: Egyetemi Nyomda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lendvai L. F., & Nyíri J. K. (1974). A filozófia rövid története: A Védáktól Wittgensteinig. Budapest: Kossuth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (1998). Lakatos in Hungary. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 28, 244–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1910a). Arról a bizonyos homályosságról. In his Ifjúkori Művek. Budapest: Magvető, 1977.

  • Lukács, G. (1910b). Megjegyzések az irodalomtörténet elméletéhez. In his Ifjúkori Művek. Budapest: Magvető, 1977.

  • Lukács, G. (1911a). Wilhelm Dilthey. In his Ifjúkori Művek. Budapest: Magvető, 1977.)

  • Lukács, G. (1911b). A modern dráma fejlődésének története. Budapest: Magvető, 1978.

  • Lukács, G. (1923). History and class consciousness. London: Merlin, 1967.

  • Lukács, G. (1963). Die Theorie des Romans. Neuwied: Luchterland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1969). Művészet és társadalom. Budapest: Gondolat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1989). Megélt gondolkodás—Életrajz magnószallagon. Budapest: Magvető.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1918a). Lélek és kultúra. In É. Karádi & E. Vezér (Ed.), A Vasárnapi Kör. Budapest: Gondolat, 1980.

  • Mannheim, K. (1918b). The structural analysis of epistemology. In Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1953.

  • Mannheim, K. (1918c). Georg Simmel mint filozófus. In É. Karádi & E. Vezér (Ed.), A Vasárnapi Kör. Budapest: Gondolat, 1980.

  • Mannheim, K. (1929). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954.

  • Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Márkus, G. (1978). Marxism and anthropology. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Márkus, G. (1995). On ideology-critique—critically. Thesis Eleven, 43, 66–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mészáros, A. (2000). A filozófia Magyarországon: A kezdetektől a 19. század végéig. Bratislava: Kalligram.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1933). Unified science and psychology. In B. McGuinness (Ed.), Unified Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1987.

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1974). Beim Sternenlicht der Nichtexistirenden: Zur ideologiekritischen Interpretation des platonisierenden Antipsychologismus. Inquiry, 17, 399–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1981). Philosophy and its negation in Austria and Hungary. In J. C. Nyíri (Ed.), Austrian philosophy: Studies and texts. München: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1986). Gefühl und Gefüge: Studien zum Entstehen der Philosophie Wittgensteins. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1986). The Austrian element in the philosophy of science. In J. C. Nyíri (Ed.), From Bolzano to Wittgenstein: The tradition of Austrian philosophy. Vienna: Hölder–Pichler–Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1988). Am Rande Europas: Studien zur österreichisch-ungarischen Philosophiegeschichte. Vienna: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyíri J. C. (1989). Collective reason: Roots of a sociological theory of knowledge. In Nyíri, 1992.

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1992). Tradition and individuality. Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyíri, J. C. (1996). Palágyis Kritik an der Gegenstandstheorie. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 50, 603–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp, Z. (1980). A válság filozófiájától a konszenzus szociológiájáig. Budapest: Kossuth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perecz, L. (1998). Philosophy in Hungary. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.

  • Tolnay, C. (1964). The art and thought of Michelangelo. New York: Pantheon.

  • Zalai, B. (1984). A rendszerek általános elmélete. Budapest: Gondolat.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I am more than indebted to Edward Swiderski for the immense editorial work he invested into this collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Philosophical Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 594, 1398, Budapest 62, Hungary

    Tamás Demeter

Authors
  1. Tamás Demeter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamás Demeter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demeter, T. The sociological tradition of Hungarian philosophy. Stud East Eur Thought 60, 1–16 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-008-9043-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-008-9043-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation