Abstract
This article analyses an episode in the earlyhistory of quantum theory: the controversy betweenPauli and Heisenberg about the anomalous Zeemaneffect, which was a main stumbling block for the oldquantum theory of Bohr. It is argued that theindividual philosophical views of both Pauli andHeisenberg directed their attempts to solve theanomaly and decisively influenced the solutions theyproposed. The results of this case study arecompared with the assertions of four theories ofscientific change, namely those of Kuhn, Lakatos,Laudan and Giere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bohr, N.: 1976, Collected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cassidy, D.C.: 1979, Heisenberg's First Core Model of the Atom: The Development of a Professional Style. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 10: 187-224.
Cassidy, D.C.: 1992, Uncertainty — The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg. New York: Freeman.
de Regt, H.W.: 1993, Philosophy and the Art of Scientific Discovery. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
de Regt, H.W.: 1996a, Philosophy and the Kinetic Theory of Gases. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 31-62.
de Regt, H.W.: 1996b, Are physicists' philosophies irrelevant idiosyncrasies? Philosophica 58: 125-151.
de Regt, H.W.: 1997, Erwin Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and Quantum Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28: 461-481.
Fierz, M.: 1974, Wolfgang Pauli. In C.C. Gillispie (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Volume 10. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 422-425.
Folse, H.J.: 1985, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Giere, R.N.: 1988, Explaining Science — A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Heisenberg, W.: 1969, Der Teil und das Ganze. München: R. Piper & Co.
Heisenberg, W.: 1985, Gesammelte Werke, Abteilung A, Band 1: Wissenschaftliche Originalarbeiten. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, Reflections on my Critics. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231-278.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91-196.
Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laudan, L.: 1987, Progress or Rationality? — The Prospects for Normative Naturalism. American Philosophical Quarterly 24: 19-31.
Laudan, L.: 1990, Normative Naturalism. Philosophy of Science 57: 44-59.
MacKinnon, E.: 1977, Heisenberg, Models, and the Rise of Matrix Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8: 137-188.
Pauli, W.: 1964, Collected Scientific Papers. New York: Wiley.
Pauli, W.: 1979, Wissenschaftliche Briefwechsel, Band I: 1919–1929. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Serwer, D.: 1977, Unmechanischer Zwang: Pauli, Heisenberg, and the Rejection of the Mechanical Atom 1923–1925. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8: 189-256.
van der Waerden, B.L.: 1967, Sources of Quantum Mechanics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Regt, H.W. Pauli versus Heisenberg: A Case Study of the Heuristic Role of Philosophy. Foundations of Science 4, 405–426 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009643801616
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009643801616