Skip to main content
Log in

Love discourses, sexed discourses: Luce Irigaray's Être deux

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Luce Irigaray's Être deux (1997) synthesises her linguistic research with an interpretation of Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and Lévinas. The linguistic research focuses on consistency both of an individual subject's discourse, and of the overall research findings (rather than the presence of inconsistency in those findings) to reinforce Irigaray's argument that there is a relationship between sexual difference and sexed language use. Previously in her work, Irigaray's philosophical and linguistic research were held more distinct. Être deux speculates on the extent to which a discursive analysis of the texts of Merleau-Ponty, Sartre and Lévinas might support the concept of a masculine relationship to language. While it is certainly the case that some degree of what Irigaray deems masculinity can be located in their texts, this analysis occurs through an unnecessary de-emphasis of the discursive complexity of these texts, a complexity Irigaray has been at pains to demonstrate in the methodological orientation of her earlier work on the history of philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauvoir, Simone de. 1955. Faut-il brû ler Sade? Paris: Gallimard. Beauvoir

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvoir, Simone de. 1988. The Second Sex trans. H.M. Parshley, London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergoffen, Debra B. 1997. The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered Phenomenologies, Erotic Generosities. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 1997. “The Impossibility of Women's Studies,” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 9.3: 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, Drucilla Cornell with Pheng Cheah and Elizabeth Grosz. 1998. “The Future of Sexual Difference: An Interview with Judith Butler and Drucilla Cornell,” Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 28.1 (Spring): 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of Eros: Irigaray's Rewriting of the Philosophers, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Marjery and Christine Pierce. 1976. “Holes and Slime: Sexism in Sartre's Psychoanalysis” in Carol Gould and Marx Wartofsky eds., Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation. New York: Capricorn Books. 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, Penelope. 1997. Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction and the History of Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, Penelope. 1998. "Review of Luce Irigaray's I Love To You, Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 13.2 (Spring): 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol, Catharine Mackinnon et al. 1985. “Feminist Discourse, Moral Values and the Law-A Conversation” The 1984 James McCormick Mitchell Lecture, Buffalo Law Review 34.1(Winter): 11–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1973. Le Langage des dé ments, Le Hague: Editions Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. Gillian C. Gill, Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. Parler n'est jamais neutre, Paris: Les Editions de minuit.

  • Irigaray, Luce. ed. 1987. Le Sexe linguistique, special issue of Langages 85 (March).

  • Irigaray, Luce. ed. 1990. Sexes et genres à travers les langues: é lé ments de communication sexué e, Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1991. “Questions to Emmanuel Levinas,” in Robert Bernasconi and Simon Critchley eds., Re-reading Levinas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An Ethics of Sexual Difference, trans. Carolyn Burke and Gillian C. Gill, Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1993b.je, tu, nous: Toward a Culture of Difference, trans. Alison Martin, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce.1993c.Sexes and Genealogies, trans. G.C. Gill, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1994. “Equal to whom?” in Naomi Schor and Elizabeth Weed eds., The Essential Difference, Books from Differences series. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1996a. I Love To You: Sketch of a Possible Felicity in History, trans. Alison Martin, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1996b. Le Souffle des femmes, Paris: CREF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1997 Ê tre Deux, Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, Sarah. 1985. The Enigma of Woman: Woman in Freud's Writings, trans. Catherine Porter, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1958. Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, trans. Mary Warnock, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, Gail. (forthcoming). “The French Connection: Luce Irigaray and International Research on Language and Gender,” in Linda Longmire and Lisa Merrill, eds., Untying the Tongue. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

  • Vasseleu, Cathryn. 1998. Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, Margaret. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deutscher, P. Love discourses, sexed discourses: Luce Irigaray's Être deux. Continental Philosophy Review 33, 113–131 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010099207501

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010099207501

Keywords

Navigation