Skip to main content
Log in

A Responsibility Ethics for Audit Expert Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To effectively pursue ethical action, the business community must recognize that the fundamental form of human association is not the "social contract" into which persons enter as atomic individuals, making partial commitments to each other for the purpose of gaining limited common ends or of satisfying certain laws. The fundamental form of human association is rather the face to face community in which ongoing commitments are the rule and in which aspects of every individual's experience are conditioned by the continuing membership. The following discussion initiates a preliminary phase in the consideration of what constitutes ethical issues associated with the business applications of expert systems. The focus is on knowledge based expert system applications in public accounting, specifically in the audit domain. Prior research on the development and use of expert systems in auditing has focused on a limited set of ethical issues. Niebuhr's theory of the "the responsible self" is used here to broaden the scope of what constitutes an ethical issue and provides a framework for identifying responsible action. Within this framework, an action is responsible if it takes into consideration ongoing relationships among the stakeholder groups affected. Actions prior to the development of the system along with the potential consequences for the system must be considered. The discursive requirements that provide the context and conditions necessary for implementing the proposed theoretical framework are presented and an illustration of how the responsibility ethic can be implemented in the audit expert system domain is developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AICPA: 1988, Code of Professional Conduct (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A., K. Han and A. Winston: 1988, ‘Technology, Competition and the Future of Auditing’, in A. Bailey (ed.), Auditor Productivity in the Year 2000 (Council of Arthur Young Professors, Reston, VA), pp. 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin-Morgan, A.: 1998, ‘Expert Systems for Audit Tasks-Applications and Impacts’, in M. Vasarhelyi and A. Kogan (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing, Volume 4 (Markus Wiener Publisher, New York), pp. 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin-Morgan, A.: 1993, ‘The Impact of Expert System Audit Tools on Auditing Firms in the Year 2001: A Delphi Investigation’, Journal of Information Systems (Spring), 16–34.

  • Broderick, J.: 1988, ‘A Practical Decision Support system. In in A. Bailey (ed.), Auditor Productivity in the Year 2000 (Council of Arthur Young Professors, Reston, VA) pp. 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.: 1991, Expert Systems in Public Accounting: Current Practice and Future Directions, Expert Systems with Applications 3, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. and D. Murphy: 1990, ‘The Use of Auditing Expert Systems in Public Accounting’, Journal of Information Systems (Fall), 65–72.

  • Carroll, A.: 1996, Business and Society 3rd ed. (Southwestern College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J. and R. Bricker: 1992, ‘A Critique of Knowledge-based Systems in Auditing: The Systematic Encroachment of Technical Consciousness’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3 (3, September), 205–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J. and J. Mutchler: 1988, ‘Knowledge-based Expert Systems in Auditing’, in C. Ernst (ed.), Management Expert Systems (Addison-Wesley).

  • Dillard, J. and K. Yuthas: 1997, ‘Ethical issues in Expert Systems: Lessons for Moral Philosophy’, Research on Accounting Ethics 3, 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Journal 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungan, C.: 1983, A Model of an Audit Judgment in the Form of an Expert System. Unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois.

  • Eining, M. and P. Dorr: 1991, ‘The Impact of Expert System Usage on Experiential Learning in an Auditing Setting’, Journal of Information Systems (Spring), 1–16.

  • Gaa, J.: 1996, ‘Ethics Research and Research Ethics’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 8 (Supplement), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, G. and P. Steinbart: 1992, ‘Interface Style and Training Task Difficulty as Determinants of Effective Computer-assisted Knowledge Transfer’, Decision Sciences (January-February), 128–143.

  • Goffman, E.: 1974, Frame Analysis (Northeastern University Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L., J. Damens and G. Van Ness: 1991, ‘Developing RISK ADVISOR: An Expert System for Risk Identification’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10 (Spring), 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1984, 1987, The Theory of Communicative Action, Translation by T. McCarthy (Beacon Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. and W. Messier: 1986. ‘A Preliminary Investigation of EDP-EXPERT’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Fall), 109–123.

  • Kelley, K.: 1984, Expert Problem Solving for the Audit Planning Process. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Kettner, M.: 1993, ‘Scientific Knowledge, Discourse Ethics, and Consensus Formation in the Public Domain’, in E. Winkler and J. Coombs (eds.), Applied Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA), pp. 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, O.: 1993, ‘Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern’, Journal of Business Ethics, 313–321.

  • Khani, P. and S. Zarolwin: 1995, ‘A Journal Survey: Counting on Technology’, Journal of Accountancy (May), 59–68.

  • Lampe, J. and D. Finn: 1992, ‘A Model of Auditors’ Ethical Decision Processes’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11 (Supplement), 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue, 2nd ed. (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., F. Mason and M. Culnan: 1995, Ethics of Information Management (Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meservy, R., E. Denna and J. Hansen, 1992, ‘Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Accounting, Tax, Audit Services: Research at Brigham Young University’, Expert Systems with Applications, 213–218.

  • Mitroff, I. and R. O. Mason: 1989, ‘Deep Ethical Issues in the Design of Information Systems’, Expert Systems Review (Fall), 21–25.

  • Murdock, I.: 1992, Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (Penguin Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R.: 1963, The Responsible Self (Harper Press, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, Utopia.

  • O'Leary, D. and P. Watkins: 1989, ‘Review of Expert Systems in Auditing’, Expert Systems Review (Spring-Summer), 3–22.

  • Pei. B. and J. Reneau: 1990, ‘The Effects of Memory Structure on Using Rule-based Expert Systems for Training: A Framework and an Empirical Test’, Decision Sciences 21, 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei, B., P. Steinbart and J. Reneau: 1994, ‘The Effects of Judgment Strategy and Prompting on Using Rule-based Expert Systems for Knowledge Transfer’, Journal of Information Systems (Spring), 21–42.

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Preager Publishers, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Specht, L., R. Trotter, R. Young and S. Sutton: 1991, ‘The Public Accounting Litigation Wars: Will Expert Systems Lead the Next Assault?’, Jurimetrics: Journal of Law, Science, and Technology (Winter), 247–257.

  • Spinello, R.: 1995, Ethical Aspects of Information Technology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R., P. Shenoy and G. Schafer: 1990, ‘Belief Propagation in Networks for Auditing’, Proceedings of the 1990 U.S.C./Deloitte and Touche Audit Symposium.

  • Steinbart, P.: 1984, The Construction of an Expert System to Maker Materiality Judgments. Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State University.

  • Steinbart, P.: 1987, ‘The Construction of a Rulebased Expert System as a Method for Studying Materiality Judgments’, The Accounting Review (January), 97–116.

  • Steinbart, P. and W. Accola: 1994, ‘The Effects of Explanation Type and User Involvement on Learning from and Satisfaction with Expert Systems’, Journal of Information Systems 8 (Spring), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. and J. R. Byington: 1993, ‘An Analysis of Ethical and Epistemological Issues in the Development and Implementation of Audit Expert Systems’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 5, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S., V. Arnold, and T. Arnold: 1995, ‘Toward an Understanding of the Philosophical Foundations for Ethical Development of Audit Expert Systems’, Research on Accounting Ethics 1, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, A., Expert Systems Applications in Accounting, Baldwin-Morgan, A.: 1998, ‘Expert Systems for Audit Tasks-Applications and Impacts’, in M. Vasarhelyi and A. Kogan (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing, Volume 4 (Markus Wiener Publisher, New York), pp. 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasarhelyi, M. and A. Kogan (eds.): 1998, ‘Expert Systems for Audit Tasks-Applications and Impacts’, in Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing, Volume 4 (Markus Wiener Publisher, New York).

  • Willingham J. and G. Ribar: 1988, ‘Development of an Expert Audit System for Loan Loss Evaluation.’, in A. Bailey (ed.), Auditor Productivity in the Year 2000 (Council of Arthur Young Professors, Reston, VA), pp. 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Yang and M. Vasarhelyi: 1998, ‘Expert Systems for Audit Tasks-Applications and Impacts’, in M. Vasarhelyi and A. Kogan (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing, Volume 4 (Markus Wiener Publisher, New York), pp. 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dillard, J.F., Yuthas, K. A Responsibility Ethics for Audit Expert Systems. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 337–359 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010720630914

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010720630914

Navigation