Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shifting the Paradigm of Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Information and a New Renaissance

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computing is changing the traditional field of Philosophy of Science in a very profound way. First as a methodological tool, computing makes possible ``experimental Philosophy'' which is able to provide practical tests for different philosophical ideas. At the same time the ideal object of investigation of the Philosophy of Science is changing. For a long period of time the ideal science was Physics (e.g., Popper, Carnap, Kuhn, and Chalmers). Now the focus is shifting to the field of Computing/Informatics. There are many good reasons for this paradigm shift, one of those being a long standing need of a new meeting between the sciences and humanities, for which the new discipline of Computing/Informatics gives innumerable possibilities. Contrary to Physics, Computing/Informatics is very much human-centered. It brings a potential for a new Renaissance, where Science and Humanities, Arts and Engineering can reach a new synthesis, so very much needed in our intellectually split culture. This paper investigates contemporary trends and the relation between the Philosophy of Science and the Philosophy of Computing and Information, which is equivalent to the present relation between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACM/IEEE (2001), Computing Curricula 2001, http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/index.htm

  • Bowyer, K.W. (ed.) (2000), Ethics and Computing, Wiley-IEEE Press.

  • Bynum, T.W. and Moor, J.H. (1998), The Digital Phoenix, How Computers are Changing Philosophy.

  • Carnap, R. (1994), An Introduction to The Philosophy of Science, Basic Books.

  • Chaitin, G.J. (1987), Algorithmic Information Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A. (1990), What Is This Thing Called Science?, Hackett Publishing Co.

  • Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2003a), Computing Curricula: Social, Ethical, and Professional Issues, Proceedings Conference for the Promotion of Research in IT at New Universities and at University Colleges in Sweden.

  • Dodig-Crnkovic, G. and Crnkovic, I. (2003b), Computing Curricula: Teaching Theory of Science to Computer Science Students, Proceedings Hawaii International Conference on Education.

  • Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2002), Scientific Methods in Computer Science, Proceedings Conference for the Promotion of Research in IT at New Universities and at University Colleges in Sweden.

  • Dodig-Crnkovic G. (2001), What Ultimately Matters, Indeed?, Proceedings Conference for the Promotion of Research in IT at New Universities and at University Colleges in Sweden.

  • Feyerabend, P. (2000), Against Method, Verso.

  • Floridi, L. (2003), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information.

  • Floridi, L. (2002), What is the Philosophy of Information? Metaphilosophy 33(1/2), pp. 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (1999), Philosophy and Computing: An introduction, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelas, S. (2000), Science and Modernity, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. and Schinzinger, R., (1989), Ethics In Engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. (1994), Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1985), in D.G. Bobrow and P.J. Hayes, ‘Artificial Intelligence – Where Are We?’ Artificial Intelligence 25, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1999), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1985), Tools For Thought: The History and Future of Mind-Expanding Technology, New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.C. (1995), On the Origin of Objects, Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal A.D. (1996), Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity, Social Text 46/47, pp. 217–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.R. (1993), Computational Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. (2001), Can Science Explain Everything? Anything? The New York Review of Books, May 31, 2001.

  • Weinberg, S. (1996), Sokal's Hoax, The New York Review of Books LIII(13), pp. 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1997), Science and the Modern World, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computing Laboratory IDt, Mälardalen University, P.O. Box S-721 67, Västerås, Sweden

    Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic

Authors
  1. Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodig-Crnkovic, G. Shifting the Paradigm of Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Information and a New Renaissance. Minds and Machines 13, 521–536 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026248701090

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026248701090

Search

Navigation