Skip to main content
Log in

Social contracts and corporations: A reply to Hodapp

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this reply to Professor Hodapp's criticism of my social contract theory, I focus on the misinterpretations I believe Professor Hodapp makes of the social contract tradition as well as my version of the contract. By misinterpreting the underlying purpose of social contract theory, he neglects the contract's heuristic or “functional” dimension, something that leads him to downplay the importance of the contract as a conceptual catalyst. And by adopting an overly narrow notion of rationality, he imagines circularity where none exists. Later, Professor Hodapp questions the effect of the contract upon individual liberties, and in doing so broaches a critical issue. But I attempt to show that his concerns are eliminated by close attention to the theory itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thomas Donaldson is the John A. Largay Scholar, and Professor, at the School of Business, Georgetown University, where he also holds the positions of Adjunct Professor, at the Department of Philosophy, and Senior Research Fellow, at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics. His most recent book is Ethics in International Business (Oxford University Press, 1989).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donaldson, T. Social contracts and corporations: A reply to Hodapp. J Bus Ethics 9, 133–137 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382663

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382663

Keywords

Navigation