Abstract
In this reply to Professor Hodapp's criticism of my social contract theory, I focus on the misinterpretations I believe Professor Hodapp makes of the social contract tradition as well as my version of the contract. By misinterpreting the underlying purpose of social contract theory, he neglects the contract's heuristic or “functional” dimension, something that leads him to downplay the importance of the contract as a conceptual catalyst. And by adopting an overly narrow notion of rationality, he imagines circularity where none exists. Later, Professor Hodapp questions the effect of the contract upon individual liberties, and in doing so broaches a critical issue. But I attempt to show that his concerns are eliminated by close attention to the theory itself.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Thomas Donaldson is the John A. Largay Scholar, and Professor, at the School of Business, Georgetown University, where he also holds the positions of Adjunct Professor, at the Department of Philosophy, and Senior Research Fellow, at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics. His most recent book is Ethics in International Business (Oxford University Press, 1989).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donaldson, T. Social contracts and corporations: A reply to Hodapp. J Bus Ethics 9, 133–137 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382663
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382663