Skip to main content
Log in

Hypothetico-nomological aspects of medical diagnosis Part I: General structure of the diagnostic process and its hypothesis-directed stage

  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In medical diagnostic examination three main stages may be distinguished: (a) initial exploration, (b) hypothesis-directed investigation, and (c) final diagnosis making. The purpose of this work is to study some methodological problems concerning the second of the above stages of the diagnosis and to prepare a background for a mathematical model [30] of this process.

In diagnostic problem solving, the reasoning proceeds along the main lines traced by some initial suggestions and passes through various intermediate elements which are connected with one another forming ramifying chains and nets of inferences and hypotheses. Such a complex mental construction is based on laws which form medical knowledge and reflect various regularities and relations, causal, structural, functional, and others.

The main components of diagnostic reasoning may be divided into several classes according to their function and content: leading hypotheses, working hypotheses, main diagnostic hypotheses, statements accepted as certain, intermediary and reserve hypotheses, therapeutic suggestions of immediate consequence. In an example of diagnostic problem solving these types of propositions are defined and analysed.

In diagnostic reasoning, as in every other process of rational problem solving, explanation of the observed symptoms and signs and testing of the explaining hypotheses play a predominant role. These procedures form successive, frequently numerous and diversified steps and stages of the reasoning, leading to the construction of a mental model of the patient's state. Some problems relative to the scheme of explanation, especially to that which is based on causal laws, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajdukiewicz, K.,Pragmatic Logic, PWN, Warsaw, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ajdukiewicz, K., “Classification of reasonings”,Studia Logica 2, (1955) 218–239. (In Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berlyne, D. E.,Structure and Direction of Thinking, J. Wiley, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard, C.,Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale, Baillière, Paris, 1865.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biegański, W.,Logic of Medicine, Wende, Warsaw, 1908. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bleich, H. L., ‘Computer evaluation of acid-base disorders’,J. clin. Invest. 48, (1969) 1689–1696.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonner, R. E., Evangelisti, C. J., Steinbeck, H. D., and Cohen, L., ‘A diagnostic assistance program’,Meth. Inform. Med. 5, (1966) 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braine, M. D. S., ‘On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic’,Psychol. Rev. 85, (1978) 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braithwaite, R. B.,Scientific Explanation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brodziak, A., ‘Algorithmization of natural medical diagnosis’,Ann. Med. Sec. Pol. Ac. Sci. 15, (1970) 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bunge, M.,Causality. The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bykhovskiy, M. L., Vishnevskiy, A. A., and Kharnas, S. S., ‘Problems in the development of a diagnostic process by means of mathematical machines’,Eksp. Khir. Anest. 4, (1961) 3–15. (In Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Czežowski, T.,Main Principles of Philosophical Sciences, TNT, Toruń, 1946. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Czežowski, T., ‘Classification of reasonings’,Philosophical Lectures, pp. 128–155, TNT, Toruń, 1969, (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doroszewski, J., ‘Probability evaluation in the process of testing of diagnostic hypotheses’,Studia Filozof. 10, (1972) 121–142. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Doroszewski, J., ‘Studies on the structure of medical diagnosis’,Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 11, (1973) 741–754. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Doroszewski, J., ‘Explanation and proving in diagnostic reasoning’,Post. Hig. Med. Dosw. 32, (1978) 405–424. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dudley, H. A. F., ‘Pay-off, heuristics, and pattern recognition in the diagnostic process’,Lancet, 1968/II, 723–726.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards, D. A. W., ‘Flow charts, diagnostic keys, and algorithms in the diagnosis of dysphagia’,Scot. med. J. 15, (1970) 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Engle, R. L., Flehinger, B. J., Allen, S., et al., “HEME: a computer aid to diagnosis of hematological disease’,Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 52, (1976) 584–600.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feinstein, A. R., ‘An analysis of diagnostic reasoning. I: The domain and disorders of macrobiology. II: The strategy of intermediate decisions’,Yale J. Biol. Med. 46, (1973) 212–232 and 264–283.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gross, R.,Medizinische Diagnostik — Grundlagen und Praxis, Springer, Berlin, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Groot, A. D. de,Methodology, Mouton, The Hague, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hempel, C. G.,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hempel, C. G.,Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jesdinsky, H. J., ‘Diagnose-Modelle in der Medizin’,Meth. Inform. Med. 11, (1972) 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kayser, K., ‘Logic and diagnosis’,Meth. Inform. Med. 14, (1975) 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kohout, L., ‘Algebraic models in computer-aided medical diagnosis’, in J. Anderson and J. M. Forsythe (eds.), MEDINFO 74, pp. 575–579, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Korab-Laskowska, M., ‘Algebraic framework of an optimization problem in medical diagnosis’,Int. J. Bio-med Comput. 10, (1979) 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Korab-Laskowska, M., ‘Hypothetico-nomological aspects of medical diagnosis. Part II: Formal model of the explanation and testing procedures’, in this issue.

  31. Kotarbiński, T.,Elements of Epistemology, Formal Logic and Methodology of Sciences, Ossolineum, Wroclaw, 1961. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kotarbiński, T.,A Treatise on Good Work, Ossolineum, Wroclaw, 1973. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ledley, R. S., and Lusted, L. B., ‘Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis’,Science 130, (1959) 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ledley, W. M., and Lusted, L. B., ‘The use of electronic computers in medical data processing: aids in diagnosis, current information retrieval and medical record”,IRE Trans. med. Electron. ME-7, (1960) 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lively, W. M., Szygenda, S. A., and Mize, C. E.: ‘Modelling techniques for medical diagnosis. I: Heuristic and learning programs in selected neonatal hepatic diseases’,Comput. biomed. Res. 6, (1973) 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mathew, R. J., Kulikowski, C. A., and Kaplan, K. R., ‘A multileveled representation for knowledge acquisition in medical consultation systems’, in D. B. Shires and H. Wolf (eds.) MEDINFO 77, pp. 151–156, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mize, C. E., ‘Modeling techniques for medical diagnosis. II: Differential diagnosis of neonatal hepatitis and biliary athresis’,Comput. biomed. Res. 9, (1976) 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nagel, E.,The Structure of Science, Harcourt, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nikitin, E.,Explanation: Function of Sciences, Nauka, Moscow, 1970. (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pap, A.,An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Glencoe, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pauker, S. G., Gorry, G. A., Kassirer, J. F., and Schwartz, W. B., ‘Towards the stimulation of clinical cognition’,Am. J. Med. 60, (1976) 981–996.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Popper, K. R.,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ras, Z.,A Mathematical Model of a Diagnostic Experiment, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rescher, D., ‘Discrete state systems, Markow chains, and problems in the theory of scientific explanation and prediction’,Philosophy of Science 30, (1963) 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rothschuh, K. E.,Prinzipien der Medizin, Urban und Schwarzenberg, München, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shrotliffe, E. H., Axline, S. G., Buchanan, B. G., Merigan, T. C., and Cohen, S. N., ‘An artificial intelligence program to advise physicians regarding antimicrobial therapy’,Comput biomed. Res. 6, (1973) 544–560.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stegmüller, W., ‘Explanation, prediction, scientific systematization and non-explanatory information’,Ratio 8, (1966) 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stein, M. A., and Winter, J., ‘Theory development in medical decision-making’,Int. J. bio-med. Comput. 5, (1974) 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Thiry, S., ‘Selfs-instructing physiopathological models’, in D. B. Shires and H. Wolf (eds.), MEDINFO 77, pp. 111–113, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wardle, A., and Wardle, L., ‘Computer aided diagnosis — a review of research’,Meth. Inform. Med. 17, (1978) 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Warner, H. R., Toronto, A. F., Vaesey, L. G., and Stephenson, R., ‘A mathematical approach to medical diagnosis. Application to congenital heart disease’,J. Amer. med. Ass. 177, (1961) 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Weiss, A., Kulikowski, C. A., and Safir, A., ‘Glaucoma consultation by computer’,Comput. Biol. Med. 8, (1978) 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Weiss, S., Kulikowski, C. A., Safir, A., and Amarel, S., ‘A model-based method for computer-aided medical decision-making’, forthcoming inArtif. Intel. J., special issue on application in sciences and biomedicine.

  54. Wiener, F., ‘Computer simulation of the diagnostic process in medicine’,Comput. biomed. Res. 8, (1975) 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ziemski, S.: ‘Methods of diagnosis in science and practical activity’,Prakseologia 42, (1972) 113–118. (In Polish.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by Grant No. 10.4 of the Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doroszewski, J. Hypothetico-nomological aspects of medical diagnosis Part I: General structure of the diagnostic process and its hypothesis-directed stage. Metamedicine 1, 177–194 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00883113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00883113

Key words

Navigation