Abstract
This paper provides a phenomenological account of the writing of a young woman diagnosed with schizophrenia. The method of interpretation is to put ourselves in the place of the author drawing upon a combination of sympathy, reason, common-sense, experience, and “an intersubjective world, common to us all” (Schutz, 1945: 536). The result is the recognition of the person as also capable of putting herself in the place of others so as to understand their behavior. This “role-taking success” identifies the limits of the current sociological understanding of insanity's significance in social interaction as an instance of “role-taking failure” (Rosenberg, 1992).
The very appearance of a piece of writing often permits one to recognize the presence of schizophrenia. The use of space may be quite bizarre. The varying margins betray the writer's changing mood. The letter may start at the bottom or side of the paper or very close to the top ....
Capital letters and all letters are employed without any apparent rules, the former even in the middle of a word. (Bleuler, 1950: 159)
What we want to understand is not something hidden behind the text, but something disclosed in front of it. (Ricoeur, 1971: 557)
Why do we need an art of guessing? Why do we have to “construe” the meaning? Not only — as I tried to say a few years ago — because language is metaphorical and because the double meaning of metaphorical language requires an art of deciphering which tends to unfold the several layers of meaning.... [But also] because [a text] is not a mere sequence of sentences, all on an equal footing and separately understandable. A text is a whole, a totality. (Ricoeur, 1971: 548)
References
Andreason, N. (1984).The broken brain: The biological Revolution in Psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row.
Bateson, G. (1972)Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.
Baur, S. (1991).The dinosaur man: Tales of madness and enchantment from the back ward. New York: Harper Perennial.
Bellah, R.N., Madsen R., Sullivan, W., Swidler A. and Tipton, S. (1985).Habits of the heart. New York: Harper & Row.
Bleuler, E. (1950).Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias. New York: International Universities Press.
Blum, A. (1982). Victim, patient, client, pariah: Steps in the self-understanding of the experience of suffering and affliction.Reflections: Canadian Journal of Visual Impairment 1:64–82.
Blum, A. and McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives.American Sociological Review 36: 98–109.
Bowen, M. (1978).Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
Burke, K. (1989).On symbols and society. Ed. J. Gusfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chaika, E.O. (1990).Understanding psychotic speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Cooper, D. (1978).The language of madness. London: Penguin.
Doubt, K. (1990). A theoretical note on Simmel's concept of acquaintance.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20(3): 265–276.
Doubt, K. (1992). Mead's theory of self and schizophrenia.Social Science Journal 29(3): 307–321.
Doubt, K. (1994). A Burkean hermeneutics for understanding the social character of schizophrenic language.Symbolic Interaction 17(2): 129–146.
Forrest, D. (1969). New words and neologisms: With a thesaurus of coinages by a schizophrenic savant.Psychiatry 32 44–73.
Foucault, M. (1965).Madness and civilization. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1989).Mental illness and psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1961).Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1967).Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon.
Gottesman, I. (1991).Schizophrenia genesis: The origins of madness. New York W.H. Freeman.
Grubium, J. and Holstein, J. (1990).What is family? London: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Kreisman, J. and Straus, H. (1989).I hate you — don't leave me: Understanding the border-line personality. New York: Avon.
Laing, R.D. (1969).The divided self. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
McHugh, P. (1970). A common-sense conception of deviance. In J. Douglas (Ed.),Deviance and respectability: The social construction of moral meanings. New York: Basic Books.
McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D.C. and Blum, A.F. (1974).On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mead, G.H. (1934).Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meynell, H. (1971). Philosophy and schizophrenia.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2(2): 17–30.
Mills, C.W. (1940). Situated action and vocabularies of motive.American Sociological Review 5: 904–913.
Ribeiro, B.T. (1994).Coherence in psychotic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1971). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text.Social Research 38: 529–562.
Rosenau, P.M. (1992).Post-modernism and the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rosenburg, M. (1992).The unread mind: Unraveling the mystery of madness. New York: Lexington.
Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities.Philosophy and Phenomenlogical Research 5: 533–576.
Schutz, A. (1962). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.),Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sluzki, C. and Ransom, D. (1976).Double bind: The foundation of the communicational approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Strauss, J.S. (1991). The person with delusions.British Journal of Psychiatry 159 (suppl. 14): 57–61.
Torrey, E.F. (1988).Surviving schizophrenia: A family manual. New York: Harper & Row.
Weber, M. (1947).The theory of social and economic organization, New York: Free Press.
Wolcott, R.H. (1974). Schizophrenese: A private language.Journal of Health and Social Behavior 15: 126–134.
Wrobel, J. (1990).Language and schizophrenia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We wish to thank Northeast Missouri State University for supporting this research in the form of an Academic Grant titled “An Ethnographic Study of Social Interaction and Schizophrenia, 1992–93.” “mother is not holding competely respect” is the first line of the text examined in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doubt, K., Leonard, M., Muhlenbruck, L. et al. “mother is not holding competely respect”: Making social sense of schizophrenic writing. Hum Stud 18, 89–106 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322841
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322841