Skip to main content
Log in

No Magic Bullet Explains the Evolution of Unique Human Traits

  • Short Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here I outline the argument in Kim Sterelny’s book The Evolved Apprentice. I present some worries for Sterelny from the perspective of modelers in behavioral ecology. I go on to discuss Sterelny’s approach to moral psychology and finally introduce some potential new applications for his evolved apprentice view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This article is one of four in Biological Theory’s Colloquium on Kim Sterelny’s The Evolved Apprentice: How Evolution Made Humans Unique (2012). See also Gerrans (2013, this issue); Sterelny (2013, this issue); and Sutton (2013, this issue).

  2. Hawkes and colleagues present and defend a mathematical model of grandmothering (Kim et al. 2012) and their approach reinforces much of what I have to say here about Hawkes’ approach. Their new model is a defense of grandmothering as the most important contributor to our unique evolutionary trajectory. Also, one appropriate response to this new model would be a response in kind; an alternate model that supports Sterelny’s view that grandmothering is not enough.

References

  • Downes SM, Machery E (eds) (2013) Arguing about human nature. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrans PS (2013) Imitation, mindreading and social learning. Biol Theory doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0112-4

  • Godfrey-Smith P (1996) Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Hauser MD (2006) Moral minds: how nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world. Behav Brain Sci 33:61–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy SB (2009) Mothers and others. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim PS, Coxworth JE, Hawkes K (2012) Increased longevity evolves from grandmothering. Proc Biol Sci 279:4880–4884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols S (2004) Sentimental rules: on the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols S (2005) Innateness and moral psychology. In: Carruthers P, Laurence S, Stich S (eds) The innate mind: structure and contents. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 353–369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a hostile world. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2007) Moral Nativism: A skeptical response. In: International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science Meeting, University of Exeter, Devon

  • Sterelny K (2012) The evolved apprentice. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2013) The evolved apprentice model: scope and limits. Biol Theory doi:10.1007/s135752-013-0098-y

  • Sutton J (2013) Skill and collaboration in the evolution of human cognition. Biol Theory doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0097-z

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Downes.

Additional information

Colloquium on Kim Sterelny’s The Evolved Apprentice: How Evolution Made Humans Unique.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Downes, S.M. No Magic Bullet Explains the Evolution of Unique Human Traits. Biol Theory 8, 15–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0099-x

Keywords

Navigation