Skip to main content
Log in

The research-practice gap and the role of decision analysis in closing it

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current hypotheses for the existence of the ‘research-practice gap’ focus on weaknesses in research dissemination on the one hand and practitioner attitudes and motivations on the other. It is suggested that the gap has more fundamental origins in the cognitive and value mismatch between researchers and practitioners. To narrow the gap both cultures need to use a common framework (map and language) that is located at a level of analysis between their typical modes and makes explicit provision for the consideration of values. The decision analytic framework fulfils these requirements and it is therefore argued that all reports of research should include a decision analytic representation of the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haines, A. and Jones, R. (1994). Implementing findings of research.British Medical Journal 308, 1488–1492.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chalmers, T. (1974). The impact of controlled trials on the practice of medicine.Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 41, 753–759.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boissel, J.-P. (1989). Impact of randomized clinical trials on medical practices.Controlled Clinical Trials 10, 120S-134S.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antman, E., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F. et al. (1992). A comparsion of results of metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction.Journal of the American Medical Association 268, 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Furman, C. (1989). The impact of clinical trials on clinical practice.Arzneimittel Forschung / Drug Research 39, 986–988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kassirer, J. (1992). Clinical trials and meta-analysis: what do they do for us?New England Journal of Medicine 327, 273–274.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lamas, G., Pfeffer, M., Hamm, P., Wertheimer, J.et al. (1992). Do the results of randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular drugs influence medical practice?New England Journal of Medicine 327, 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fineberg, H. (1987). Clinical evaluation: how does it influence medical practice?Bulletin of Cancer 74, 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grimshaw, J. and Russell, I. (1993). Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.The Lancet 342, 1317–1322.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grimshaw, J.M. and Russell, I.T. (1994). Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines I: Developing scientifically valid guidelines.Quality in Health Care 2, 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grimshaw, J.M. and Russell, I.T. (1994). Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.Quality in Health Care 3, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anon (1994). Implementing clinical practice guidelines.Effective Health Care 8.

  13. Davis, D.A., Thomson, M.A., Oxman, A.D. and Haynes, B. (1992). Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: a review of 50 randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Medical Association 266, 1111–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston, M.E., Langton, K.B., Haynes, B. and Mathieu, A. (1994). Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome.Annals of Internal Medicine 120, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Altman, D. (1994). The scandal of poor medical research.British Medical Journal 308, 283–284.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Culyer, A. (Chairman) (1994).Supporting Research and Development in the NHS, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peckham, M. (1994). A scientific basis for the National Health Service.Science in Parliament 51, 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anon (1992). Medical audit in general practice: effects on doctors' clinical behaviour and the health of patients with common childhood conditions [North of England Study of Standards and Performance in General Practice].British Medical Journal 304, 1480–1488.

  19. Smith, R. (1994). Towards a knowledge based health service.British Medical Journal 309, 217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hamm, R. (1988). Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum. In,Professional Judgement: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making, ed. by J. Dowie and A. Elstein, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schön, D. (1983).The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Doubilet, P. and McNeil, B. (1985). Clinical decision making.Medical Care 23, 648–662.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thornton, J.G. Lilford, R.J. and Johnson, N. (1992). Decision analysis in medicine.British Medical Journal 304, 1099–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sonnenberg, F., Roberts, M., Tsevat, J., Wong, J. et al. (1994). Towards a peer review process for medical decision analysis models.Medical Care 32, JS52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz, W. (1979). Decision analysis: a look at the chief complaints.New England Journal of Medicine 300, 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCrea, W. and Saltissi, S. (1993). Electrocardiogram interpretation in general practice: relevance to prehospital thrombolysis.British Heart Journal 70, 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eddy, D. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: problems and opportunities. In,Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. by D. Kahneman P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lyman, G. and Balducci, L. (1993). Overestimation of test effects in clinical judgement.Journal of Cancer Education 8, 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dowie, J. (1995). The dangers of partial evaluation: comment on Alan Williams 'Economics, QALYs and medical ethics: a health economist's perspective'.Health Care Analysis 3(3), 232–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowie, J. The research-practice gap and the role of decision analysis in closing it. Health Care Anal 4, 5–18 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251141

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251141

Keywords

Navigation