Skip to main content
Log in

Explicit algebraic models for constructive and classical theories with non-standard elements

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe an explicit construction of algebraic models for theories with non-standard elements either with classical or constructive logic. The corresponding truthvalue algebra in our construction is a complete algebra of subsets of some concrete decidable set. This way we get a quite finitistic notion of true which reflects a notion of the deducibility of a given theory. It enables us to useconstructive, proof-theoretical methods for theories with non-standard elements. It is especially useful in the case of theories with constructive logic where algorithmic properties are essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.C. Kleene, Introduction to Metamathematics,D. van Nostrand Co., New York, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.G. Dragalin, Mathematical Intuitionism. Introduction to Proof Theory,Translations of AMS,67, 1988.

  3. A. Robinson, Non-Standard Analysis,Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Davis, Applied Nonstandard Analysis,A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1977.

  5. A.G. Dragalin, An explicit Boolean-valued model for non-standard arithmetic,Publicationes Mathematicae, Debrecen, 3–4,42, (1993), pp. 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Rasiowa andR. Sikorski, The Mathematics of Metamathematics (second ed.),PWN, Warszawa, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.G. Dragalin, A Completeness Theorem for Higher-order Intuitionistic Logic. An Intuitionistic Proof., in: Mathematical Logic and its Applications (ed. Dimiter Skordev, Gödel session),Plenum Press, New York, 1987, pp. 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.G. Dragalin, Cut-elimination Theorem for Higher-order Classical Logic. An Intuitionistic Proof., in: Mathematical Logic and its Applications (ed. Dimiter Skordev, Gödel session),Plenum Press, New York, 1987, pp. 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.A. Kripke, Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic I., in: Formal Systems and Recursive Functions (Proc, Eighth Logic Colloq., Oxford, 1963),North-Holland, 1965, pp. 92–130.

  10. A.G. Dragalin, Complete Heyting and Boolean algebras over a partial ordering. Constructive apporoaches,accepted in the Proc. of the Colloq. on Topology, János Bolyai Math. Soc., August 23–27, 1993, Szekszárd, Hungary; also as Technical Report No 93/80, University of Debrecen, Math. Inst., 1993.

  11. A.N. Kolmogoroff andA.G. Dragalin, Introduction to Mathematical Logic.,Moscow University, 1982 (in Russian).

  12. E. Mendelson, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 3-rd ed.,Wodsworth and Brooks, Calif. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Takahashi, Cut-elimination theorem and Brouwerian-valued models for intuitionistic type theory,Comment. Math. Univ. St. Paul. 19, (1971), pp. 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.G. Dragalin, The collapse of the descriptive complexity of truth definitions,Bull. of the Section of Logic,20, (1991), pp. 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.G. Dragalin, ‘Completeness and cut-eleimination theorems in classical higher-order logics. Constructive methods’ (in Russian),Izvestiya VUZov, Moskva3, 1993, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported partly by the Hungarian National Fundation for Scientific Research No. 1654.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dragalin, A.G. Explicit algebraic models for constructive and classical theories with non-standard elements. Stud Logica 55, 33–61 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053031

Keywords

Navigation